You are an extremely fat sex object.

Oh my.... *swallows hard. *nods

You had to use the word 'wobble' didn't you?

This is a real shame because you convey how delightfully sensuous, almost intoxicating in its sensuality, all that weighty flesh on your belly is, both in your pics and your vids. Perhaps some people fumble what they seek to give back from enjoying what you post. Maybe others are too much 'in the moment' Obviously I can't speak to the difficulties of bending down. Would that it were less necessary!

I must admit I'm surprised that nobody else has replied to such a distractingly sexy post so I thought I would! Admitting that the addition is arousing to you, is itself arousing. So I both delight in your happiness and obtain a little bit of my own. What a wonderfully virtuous circle!

@bbwildrose .. and that you are an excellent photographer and diplomat extraordinaire.

Rolls eyes.. always the negative <3

It is conceivable that, for some women on this site who display because they need attention, but are actually doing things they feel unhappy about, the phrase 'attention whore' has some bite. Perhaps they should think a bit more about that issue, perhaps they do.

However, beware the self-appointed person who feels the need to declare people attention whores for they are really expressing their own issues about either needing to be the centre of attention themselves, needing for women to be in their place, for certain women to feel unattractive or grateful, self-loathing, and so on. Men who feel threatened by having a sexual partner who is widely admired may also try to pen their woman (or men) in by bandying about the phrase 'attention whore'.

Any woman (or man) who is happy to give a little delight to others, in world where fatness is decried as unattractive, by showing how sexy their fat is, has my thanks... and they clearly are doing some good within a wider aesthetic project which supplies excellent cover for being extra naughty.

If they pluck up courage to display themselves, I likewise (and this seems to me the reverse side of the same coin) pluck up courage to say how gorgeous they are, what attracts me about them. This is not something I'd say in real life - not because I'm a closet FA (I'm not), but because making those kind of comments to a woman outside of a particular intimate context is damn inappropriate and objectifying. However, correct constraints like this in daily life, does have the consequence that if the media etc. say only this kind of woman (i.e. thin) is attractive and you are bound by social niceties from saying 'I really love how your belly roll swells out and tightens the material in that top, the form is so beautiful and sexy' then there is nothing to challenge the orthodoxy. Where is the poor fat woman (or man) to learn that they are simply gorgeous as they are to a large number of people?

You're obviously beautiful so I suspect that Layla's absolutely right (and it is what others have observed to me in their own case), namely the low ratings are from jealousy or from people you have ignored. Indeed, one might think that the pattern of very high ratings plus some low ratings was a measure of higher impact (on the grounds that some people are sufficiently affected by your beauty they want to down you). A clean sheet of perfection would mean you're no 'threat'. Here I display my greater nobility of spirit. I don't hold against you the fact that you have failed to send to me PMs full of yearning for my extreme age and clear anonymity. Each to their own, I say.

There are, of course, the delightful third category who, out of misplaced honesty perhaps (entertains the most charitable reading) are commenting on quality of pic rather than individual (e.g. lighting, camera angle, quality of digital camera, whether you have flashed enough of what makes them weak at the knees and so forth). I'll leave you to work out how best to track down, and ensnare, those enthusiasts for fine photography.

Very sexy. Are you still not aiming to gain and just seeing what happens? A couple of your comments like breaking through the 265 barrier suggests a bit of purpose :-)