Well, chubbyhoney, part of the issue, they say, is that skinnies don't like the spillage coming into contact with them. See below, though--I'm not convinced.
Here's the seat issue, as I see it, in a few nutshells.
1. Seats are not a fixed size. As we all know the vary from airline to airline, and for those of us who have been flying for decades, they've gotten smaller and smaller and smaller, while people have simultaneously been getting bigger.
2. Airlines didn't always use the same business model as they do now. When I was younger, people didn't fly *nearly* as often as we do now. Seats were bigger, and more expensive, and none of this was an issue. Also, if I remember correctly, most European airlines were nationalised, or at least semi-nationalised. Not subsidised, I don't think, although I honestly don't know. Nonetheless, there were no discount airlines, and flying was mostly done by business people and the wealthy.
3. Finally, I think we have to wonder what's being sold when a person buys a ticket. We generally, until very, very recently, have assumed that what we were buying is one person's travel, not 25 inches of seat space. Why should fat people pay more for travel? We are still each one person, and not less of one because there's more of us. Very buff passengers, who weigh more, are not being asked to pay more, yet they accrue the same fuel costs, so it can't be that. I've sat next to people who didn't mind my hips touching them, and others who were so skinny that we didn't even touch, so it can't be that either.
Once you really look at it, it's the intersection of, on the one hand, fat hatred run amok among the public, and on the other hand the grotesque profiteering of airlines. If they had kept their original business models, they wouldn't be in this predicament. And we'd be using a lot less fuel, contributing less to global warning, etc.
14 years