Only just found this, came out as Rational, which was what I would have expected. That I play chess and poker competatively and analyse most things to death, this was hardly a surprise. Didn't want to spend the extra $15, but I am pretty sure that Rational-Architect fits best.
I did find some of the questions rather vague and difficault to answer, such as: Does interacting with strangers
( ) tax your reserves
( ) energise you
If it's just small talk then that is just boring and would clearly tax me, however, if the interaction is of importance, or interesting in the personal, or detail, then clearly for me it energises. There were many questions like that, that seemed to me not specific enough. However, as I am clearly over analysing again the test clearly had me pinpointed.
12 years