rubyripples wrote:
One had a long article on how to look sexy for your man in bed (yes, really) and strongly advised that if you have a fat belly you must at all costs avoid small knickers as your belly fat could squeeze out of the leg holes, and that would look most unattractive and turn him off obviously. So you should wear camiknickers, with legs, which are "much more flattering" (read - slimming). I couldn't believe my eyes that they STILL clearly believed that fat IS ugly and that a woman's male partner was with her despite her fat and couldn't actually be attracted to his fat partner's body. It was all about how the woman could "hide" her fatness. In a magazine that was actually designed for plus size women, not even one designed for "all" women, like this new one.
to the lot of 'em so far. lol
One had a long article on how to look sexy for your man in bed (yes, really) and strongly advised that if you have a fat belly you must at all costs avoid small knickers as your belly fat could squeeze out of the leg holes, and that would look most unattractive and turn him off obviously. So you should wear camiknickers, with legs, which are "much more flattering" (read - slimming). I couldn't believe my eyes that they STILL clearly believed that fat IS ugly and that a woman's male partner was with her despite her fat and couldn't actually be attracted to his fat partner's body. It was all about how the woman could "hide" her fatness. In a magazine that was actually designed for plus size women, not even one designed for "all" women, like this new one.

sorry but who the hell wears any type of panties while having sex ??
13 years