joeman123 wrote:shryve wrote:
Well I am a Atheist so to me you are taking about fantasy.
If there was a God then you would a arrogant hole for speaking for God or better yet this must God's plan or maybe God is not even bothered by things like this.
Truth is that Mother Nature did give men small breasts and it is above my pay grade to decide when and why they have started to grow or why some BBWs hardly have any breast
lol wut?
No one cares if your an atheist. I'm an agnostic because that is the only logical belief to take.
Some bbw's hardly have any breasts because of genetics where they disperse their fat. However, as a whole males are predispositioned to have smaller tits than girls.
I believe in darwinism. Guys would never get fat in the first place and if they did they would be killed off. Of course I contradict because I like fat chicks too.
idontevenknowwhyimstillarguing
Ugh, every single post of yours on this site so far is either offensive or ignorant or just plain idiotic.
The reason Shryve referred to being an atheist was because your previous post said "If god wanted..." twice, as some kind of apparent attempt to back up your stance on who "should" and "should not" have bigger breasts. So before you say "lol wut" again, follow your own argument on the thread through and have a think about why people are responding the way they do to your comments. To say "No one cares if your [sic] an atheist" is not only rude and provocative, but displays a rather goldfish-style memory for your own previous "point".
Interestingly you've now referred to believing in the laws of nature, then Darwinism, but in between said:
joeman123 wrote:
"if god wanted man to have bigger or comparable boobs to woman, then men would grow udders like girls do. if god wanted woman to have more or comparable muscle to man, he would have gave more testosterone to them"
Then you say you're agnostic. So quite aside from being offensive, as Eve pointed out, you also seem pretty confused and/or ill-informed to me.