General

About your profile ...

... I see a lot of people who label themselves as a feeder, but when you read their profile, they describe themselves as a feedee. I don't see how that's going to help them come up in the search results for those seeking a feedee. In a nutshell, if you are seeking a feeder, label yourself as a feedee. If you want to feed someone else, label yourself as a feeder.
2 years

About your profile ...

PearLover:
... I see a lot of people who label themselves as a feeder, but when you read their profile, they describe themselves as a feedee. I don't see how that's going to help them come up in the search results for those seeking a feedee. In a nutshell, if you are seeking a feeder, label yourself as a feedee. If you want to feed someone else, label yourself as a feeder.


IIRC, when you sign up for an account, feeder is the first option listed under kinks. So, essentially, these people put the least amount of effort in creating their page.

You hate to see it.

This is also why hammering down the community's demographics is so hard.
2 years

About your profile ...

PearLover:
... I see a lot of people who label themselves as a feeder, but when you read their profile, they describe themselves as a feedee. I don't see how that's going to help them come up in the search results for those seeking a feedee.


keep in mind, this isn't a dating site. how someone shows up in a search is not a concern for a lot of members, because they're not "seeking" another person. we're here for the discussion, the chat (for the chat itself), the stories, etc.

it you want to select potential partners based on a set of filters, try a dayting app like wooplus. it's how my partner found me.
2 years

About your profile ...

PearLover:
... I see a lot of people who label themselves as a feeder, but when you read their profile, they describe themselves as a feedee. I don't see how that's going to help them come up in the search results for those seeking a feedee.

Canuck:
keep in mind, this isn't a dating site. how someone shows up in a search is not a concern for a lot of members, because they're not "seeking" another person. we're here for the discussion, the chat (for the chat itself), the stories, etc.

it you want to select potential partners based on a set of filters, try a dayting app like wooplus. it's how my partner found me.


I don't think that's what OP is talking about.

There's a specific user flavor on here that I come across a lot. It's not gender-specific, either. These people will put in just enough effort in their profile to fill it out partially, but then, despite being strictly feedees, not take the two seconds to update their kink from feeder (the default) to feedee.

Then, when interacting with others on the site, they get confused as to why others are treating them like a feedee.

There are a couple of reasons for this.

1. Non-native English speakers that mixed feedee and feeder up.

2. Being lazy.

The first group gets a pass, but the second?

Oy very.

Istg, they are annoying. And they always act so entitled too. Like you feeding them is a gift to mankind when you just wanted to make conversation.
2 years

About your profile ...

Morbidly A Beast:
I wish there were other options, like gainer feedee don’t really fit right at least not for me, I’d feel much better if there was a option for something like BHM or something along those lines

Fat Admirer might work but that seems to be more like active seeking of fat than just being okay with being fat.

I feel like the people who don’t have it right probably aren’t real accounts usually don’t have anything else and are probably picture ripped from other people online. I’ve seen a lot of models pictures on here from profiles that are clearly not that model


If you see accounts like that, please report them. It’s super helpful. There are very few people who actually report fake accounts (there are a couple people who are great about it) and it’s hands down the easiest way to identify them. I know I don’t have an encyclopedic knowledge of every web model out there, nobody does, but everyone working together can make a difference.
2 years

About your profile ...

Ditzy:
Just because they mark it as such doesn't mean they are looking for a feeder.
Case in point I'm not looking for anything just come here to converse with old friends.


Ditzy, your profile is clear about who you are and what you want. Yours is an good example of how a profile should be done.
2 years

About your profile ...

PearLover:
... I see a lot of people who label themselves as a feeder, but when you read their profile, they describe themselves as a feedee. I don't see how that's going to help them come up in the search results for those seeking a feedee.

Canuck:
keep in mind, this isn't a dating site. how someone shows up in a search is not a concern for a lot of members, because they're not "seeking" another person. we're here for the discussion, the chat (for the chat itself), the stories, etc.

it you want to select potential partners based on a set of filters, try a dayting app like wooplus. it's how my partner found me.



It may not be a dating site per se, but many people are using it as that. I see a lot of cases where people are almost begging for a feeder, but listing themselves as a feeder. And these are people who are using to seek a partner.

If you want to use it for just the "fantasy" aspect that's fine, but what harm would it cause you to let other people use it the way they want? Feedism is a niche fetish. As far as I know, there is Fantasyfeeder, Feabie and some groups on Fetlife. That's it. Nada más.

Let's you and I come to an agreement; You don't tell me what to do and I'll extend the same courtesy to you. Thank you.

If I was looking for something vanilla, I wouldn't be here. I am on other dating sites, but I'm not as active on those. I am also seeking in the real world where I currently live. Finding. a feeder is a desire I have, but not a requirement. I seek a connection first. And I realize that finding a feeder might be what I want, but it wouldn't be good for me.

But I digress. Thank you for your free advice; it's worth every penny of that price.
2 years

About your profile ...

PearLover:
... I see a lot of people who label themselves as a feeder, but when you read their profile, they describe themselves as a feedee. I don't see how that's going to help them come up in the search results for those seeking a feedee.

Canuck:
keep in mind, this isn't a dating site. how someone shows up in a search is not a concern for a lot of members, because they're not "seeking" another person. we're here for the discussion, the chat (for the chat itself), the stories, etc.

it you want to select potential partners based on a set of filters, try a dayting app like wooplus. it's how my partner found me.

Munchies:
I don't think that's what OP is talking about.

There's a specific user flavor on here that I come across a lot. It's not gender-specific, either. These people will put in just enough effort in their profile to fill it out partially, but then, despite being strictly feedees, not take the two seconds to update their kink from feeder (the default) to feedee.

Then, when interacting with others on the site, they get confused as to why others are treating them like a feedee.

There are a couple of reasons for this.

1. Non-native English speakers that mixed feedee and feeder up.

2. Being lazy.

The first group gets a pass, but the second?

Oy very.

Istg, they are annoying. And they always act so entitled too. Like you feeding them is a gift to mankind when you just wanted to make conversation.


Munchies, I am in complete agreement with you. Thank you.
2 years

About your profile ...

Canuck:
keep in mind, this isn't a dating site. how someone shows up in a search is not a concern for a lot of members, because they're not "seeking" another person. we're here for the discussion, the chat (for the chat itself), the stories, etc.

it you want to select potential partners based on a set of filters, try a dayting app like wooplus. it's how my partner found me.

Munchies:
I don't think that's what OP is talking about.

There's a specific user flavor on here that I come across a lot. It's not gender-specific, either. These people will put in just enough effort in their profile to fill it out partially, but then, despite being strictly feedees, not take the two seconds to update their kink from feeder (the default) to feedee.

Then, when interacting with others on the site, they get confused as to why others are treating them like a feedee.

There are a couple of reasons for this.

1. Non-native English speakers that mixed feedee and feeder up.

2. Being lazy.

The first group gets a pass, but the second?

Oy very.

Istg, they are annoying. And they always act so entitled too. Like you feeding them is a gift to mankind when you just wanted to make conversation.

PearLover:
Munchies, I am in complete agreement with you. Thank you.


Look, I get it. I can't tell you how many times I got excited seeing a potential female feeder to befriend (I am one too) only for them to get nasty with me saying they only want to be fed.

On the flip side, I've had many a guy labeled "feeder" hit me up out of the blue. Then, when I say I don't want to be fed as I am a feeder, they switch up. They insist they are actually a feedee, but they were too lazy to change it. And then they start demanding you feed them or tell them about your sex life in graphic detail.

Sometimes you talk to these people, and they couldn't tell you what the difference between a feeder and a feedee is. I'm not one to gatekeep newbies from the community. Lotta people join to help figure things out. But please take the two seconds it takes to google the basics.
2 years

About your profile ...

munchies, if laziness is really the biggest issue here, it could be solved just by changing the volume to "blank" or "undecided."

your comments around people learning about a community before diving head-first into it are a good observation... back when i first discovered the world of feedism, probably the late 90s, it was such a tiny online community (because most of the world was still offline at that point), this wasn't an issue because everything was so basic. there was dimensions online and maybe one or two other destinations, and the "glossary" was pretty up-front. now there are a lot of spaces with slightly different angles - ff isn't the same as curvage, which isn't the same as feabie, etc. etc... plus the plus-size, body acceptance, (etc. etc.) movements have all added layers of complexity and different lenses...

(it's not a bad thing at all, it's really blossomed in fact... but with that blossoming come opportunists, too...)
2 years
12   loading