Feedback and suggestions

Moderation.

Locking things up when people have disagreements is not moderation it’s just censorship.


And just letting someone derail a conversation while it’s happening then coming back later when everyone has said there peace isn’t moderation it’s just being a heavy handed janny.
2 months

Moderation.

You people have a lot more problems than people arguing on the forums. This is BS.
2 months

Moderation.

Locking threads is not something done lightly or to halt discussion unfairly. It’s important to allow users to engage in polite and constructive conversations.

However, when threads are derailed or turn into personal arguments, it no longer reflects the original topic.

In such cases, locking threads temporarily or removing disruptive posts and then reopening the thread is the best way to keep discussions civil and maintain a positive environment for everyone.

Allowing users to post hurtful or hostile content would only damage the forum’s community, and this isn’t something that can be allowed.

The moderation team is small but works diligently to manage the site. Their responsibilities include content moderation, handling customer service, verifying members, dealing with premium content, monitoring for bugs, addressing abuse reports, checking for scammers, and thinking about site improvements, amongst many other things including keeping an eye on the forums. Please remember that this is all done by a wonderful group of people who volunteer their time.

c00kie
FF Team
1 month

Moderation.

I think when people are being openly racist and being called out for it being let run loose is a bit different than having a very tame gentle criticism of someone.
1 month

Moderation.

Morbidly A Beast:
I think when people are being openly racist and being called out for it being let run loose is a bit different than having a very tame gentle criticism of someone.


Could you please provide more details or specify which threads or posts you're referring to? That way, I can investigate the issue further and ensure we address any concerns appropriately.

Thanks,
c00kie
FF Team
1 month

Moderation.

Morbidly A Beast:
Locking things up when people have disagreements is not moderation it’s just censorship.


And just letting someone derail a conversation while it’s happening then coming back later when everyone has said there peace isn’t moderation it’s just being a heavy handed janny.


Jannies with heavy hands are the best spankers.

When I read the post topic "Moderation", I honestly thought people were about to be told to slow down with the gaining.
1 month

Moderation.

Morbidly A Beast:
Locking things up when people have disagreements is not moderation it’s just censorship.


And just letting someone derail a conversation while it’s happening then coming back later when everyone has said there peace isn’t moderation it’s just being a heavy handed janny.

SomeFella:
Jannies with heavy hands are the best spankers.

When I read the post topic "Moderation", I honestly thought people were about to be told to slow down with the gaining.


Time and place, love.
1 month

Moderation.

I was planning to open a discussion about moderation myself but i wasnt super motivated. Now that i see one, i should intervene before it goes horribly wrong.

If we are going to have a discussion about moderation, which i hope this is one, we first need to actually understand clearly what moderation is in the first place and agree on a single definition. We can, and we should debate what definition we should proceed with, that is something that needs to happen. Thats because we cannot have any discussion, with which we will reach a helpfull logical conclusion, if Everyone's definitions contradict each other. I think a good way to do this would be to define what are the needs of a community that moderation is an attempt to satisfy, from which we can easily figure out what should the goals of moderation be, and then we can finally figure out how FantasyFeeder should be moderated, so that these goals will be achieved. I think this is a good outline of what we should be really doing, so i would like us to (hopefully) proceeded with that,unless someone can come up with a better idea.

So, what is everyone's thesis on the first question "What are the needs of this community that moderation ought to cover"? (Lets put the Hegelian dialectic to work, and see what are the good points that people bring up, and use those to synthesize a more developed thesis!)
1 month

Moderation.

Enas:
I was planning to open a discussion about moderation myself but i wasnt super motivated. Now that i see one, i should intervene before it goes horribly wrong.

If we are going to have a discussion about moderation, which i hope this is one, we first need to actually understand clearly what moderation is in the first place and agree on a single definition. We can, and we should debate what definition we should proceed with, that is something that needs to happen. Thats because we cannot have any discussion, with which we will reach a helpfull logical conclusion, if Everyone's definitions contradict each other. I think a good way to do this would be to define what are the needs of a community that moderation is an attempt to satisfy, from which we can easily figure out what should the goals of moderation be, and then we can finally figure out how FantasyFeeder should be moderated, so that these goals will be achieved. I think this is a good outline of what we should be really doing, so i would like us to (hopefully) proceeded with that,unless someone can come up with a better idea.

So, what is everyone's thesis on the first question "What are the needs of this community that moderation ought to cover"? (Lets put the Hegelian dialectic to work, and see what are the good points that people bring up, and use those to synthesize a more developed thesis!)


Enas ... there is a literal moderator in this thread. She's the site owner's right-hand woman. Right now, all she is asking for are examples for better praxis. She doesn't need you to tell her how to perform debate.

This is akin to reading a bunch of books about surgical practice and telling a surgeon how to do their job.

All that said, if I am blunt, this is an example of what Morbidly is talking about.
1 month

Moderation.

Enas:
I was planning to open a discussion about moderation myself but i wasnt super motivated. Now that i see one, i should intervene before it goes horribly wrong.

If we are going to have a discussion about moderation, which i hope this is one, we first need to actually understand clearly what moderation is in the first place and agree on a single definition. We can, and we should debate what definition we should proceed with, that is something that needs to happen. Thats because we cannot have any discussion, with which we will reach a helpfull logical conclusion, if Everyone's definitions contradict each other. I think a good way to do this would be to define what are the needs of a community that moderation is an attempt to satisfy, from which we can easily figure out what should the goals of moderation be, and then we can finally figure out how FantasyFeeder should be moderated, so that these goals will be achieved. I think this is a good outline of what we should be really doing, so i would like us to (hopefully) proceeded with that,unless someone can come up with a better idea.

So, what is everyone's thesis on the first question "What are the needs of this community that moderation ought to cover"? (Lets put the Hegelian dialectic to work, and see what are the good points that people bring up, and use those to synthesize a more developed thesis!)

Munchies:
Enas ... there is a literal moderator in this thread. She's the site owner's right-hand woman. Right now, all she is asking for are examples for better praxis. She doesn't need you to tell her how to perform debate.

This is akin to reading a bunch of books about surgical practice and telling a surgeon how to do their job.

All that said, if I am blunt, this is an example of what Morbidly is talking about.


I was refering to everybody. I think pluralism is needed here more than anything.

There is also a long debate to be held on what moderation should be in the first place. Im here to talk about that, not to instruct. That is also why i didnt express my thesis on it, i dont have one. The best i can do is see problems in other people's thesis. Which is gonna be helpfull later on, hopefully.
1 month
123   loading