Professorbigbody:
Not to mention how bad it is for the environment and for artists' careers. If anyone can make something "good enough" then what's the point of artists at all?
The carbon footprint is INSANE. The amount of energy taken up by AI is nearly that of the country of Japan.
In my opinion, AI should be used as a reference or a tool for human art. Not the final product
If AI struggles with fingers, it struggles with every other part of anatomy. The common eye doesn’t notice when specific proportions look wrong, but it may look weird or uncanny without a direct reasoning for why it looks unnatural. Artists should be referencing real art.
