General

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

No. As the quality of AI goes up, it become difficult to determine what is real or what is not real. Here in Fantasy Feeder, I feel it is important to show the real you.
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Not only no but hell no. The essence of art, be it visual or written, is that it is a window into humanity. The emotions, thoughts, and experiences of the artist, distilled into a story or picture or animation. That's a beautiful thing, and it offends me that so many people think you can duplicate the humanity of art with an algorithm.
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Truer words have never been spoken!!
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Ai is a tool, I don't mind it's use in our community. As long as it's with respect and appropriate disclosure. As with any medium I guess.
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Absolutely not. Using it to "create" circumvents existing copyright laws through legal gray areas and produces a pale imitation of what actual human creativity can create. Using it for searches? Not only does AI just blatantly get things wrong, we actually see an increase in AI hallucinations with the "more sophisticated" (ie newer) models. One of the AI companies released a "report" supposedly done by humans with graphs so fake it could have ONLY been made with AI and no human oversight.
Not to mention the extreme use of electricity and water. AI servers are also being put in poorer neighborhoods, often near historically black or other minority hubs. The pollution is already horrible and I don't know about anyone else, but the health risks alone should be very worrying for a community like this, where we're already foregoing some health advice to fulfill desires and/or kink.
AI content will never be up to the standard of what a human can come up with.
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Tapanda:
Absolutely not. Using it to "create" circumvents existing copyright laws through legal gray areas and produces a pale imitation of what actual human creativity can create. Using it for searches? Not only does AI just blatantly get things wrong, we actually see an increase in AI hallucinations with the "more sophisticated" (ie newer) models. One of the AI companies released a "report" supposedly done by humans with graphs so fake it could have ONLY been made with AI and no human oversight.
Not to mention the extreme use of electricity and water. AI servers are also being put in poorer neighborhoods, often near historically black or other minority hubs. The pollution is already horrible and I don't know about anyone else, but the health risks alone should be very worrying for a community like this, where we're already foregoing some health advice to fulfill desires and/or kink.
AI content will never be up to the standard of what a human can come up with.


AI straight up does not qualify for copyright. This has been legally confirmed. If something slips through the cracks, but later gets found out, the copyright will be struck. There is legal precident for this.
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Tapanda:
Absolutely not. Using it to "create" circumvents existing copyright laws through legal gray areas and produces a pale imitation of what actual human creativity can create. Using it for searches? Not only does AI just blatantly get things wrong, we actually see an increase in AI hallucinations with the "more sophisticated" (ie newer) models. One of the AI companies released a "report" supposedly done by humans with graphs so fake it could have ONLY been made with AI and no human oversight.
Not to mention the extreme use of electricity and water. AI servers are also being put in poorer neighborhoods, often near historically black or other minority hubs. The pollution is already horrible and I don't know about anyone else, but the health risks alone should be very worrying for a community like this, where we're already foregoing some health advice to fulfill desires and/or kink.
AI content will never be up to the standard of what a human can come up with.

Munchies:
AI straight up does not qualify for copyright. This has been legally confirmed. If something slips through the cracks, but later gets found out, the copyright will be struck. There is legal precident for this.


While I do agree with you, I meant more that AI has been given the "right" to train on copyright material over the copyright holder's choice. It's ethically a very gray area using it, in that sense (along with several others)
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Huge nay ew gross
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Thanks for bringing this up to talk about. I also agree, AI sucks and I am super tired of seeing it. I'm actively really turned off by it now and really would like to be able to filter for AI.
10 months

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Morbidly A Beast:
i think that the weight gain ai videos are a good thing because it will eventually take priority over the sort of usurious fetishism many people engage in online with real human beings, with no concern for their health and well being.


I feel as though by allowing the continuation and proliferation of A.I. content in this sphere of creation, we are going to see an exaggeration of what people are gonna start wanting. Thay slippery slope might just make what would have been normal feedees who would only go as big as 2, 3, 400 pounds, and start creating far more 4, 5, 600 pounds.

With A.I. being less restricted on what it can make, it'll allow people fantasies to go even more out there. I think we can already see that now actually.
10 months
12345   loading