General

My general take is ai is not a better than a pre ai google search or research
Ai doesn't have the ability to reason or understand
It finds a pattern and finds information that might be close but it doesn't reason

Ai is bad because every time I try I try to jerk it there is poorly made sloop directive of actual human creativity. I scroll through AO3 try to find good artful porn and there's a guy spamming AI generated trash clogging the tags hiding actual good fic's

Folks can be jerk it to ai slop in the shadows of the house but don't try to enter Plato's rave the bastions kink internet made with love erotica trying to pass store bought as home made and not get bullied of

Ai wg "art" images are worse because there are actually artists if folks were brave enough they could learn how to draw a Belly and a beautiful rack of tits
If can't draw many people can and have been making fantastic kink art since forever

No one is born inherently talented, it's a pursed interest

Care about yourself enough live a life that's real

I would wager that 75% of the story content is now AI generated on this site. If all of the story thumbnails are AI generated, it is a certainty that the stories are also. People don't just become incredible writers all of a sudden like we've witnessed on this site.

Which brings me to this point. Anyone who is paying someone money to read their stories are on here are just fools. It's the closest thing to fraud that I can think of.

Nah, let him continue. This is hilarious.

Mhm. And is this what your mother used to tell you as you got another failing grade in school for your ChatGPT-written essays?

Bless your heart.

It's always funny to see a smug troll become a lolcow in real time.

It really is annoying.

I remember a time before generative AI. Yeah, there was a lot of shitty erotica out there. Poorly written stories and bad art. But, inevitably, those people would get better over time. Some of them even became good.

Don't see that with the generative AI crowd. They spit out things that are aggressively mid at best and hard to look at at worst. But for all the talk of generative AI being a tool, I don't see any of them getting better. They stay the same.

This isn't the same as the traditional vs digital debate. Whether or not you like digital art, you can't deny that digital artists aren't putting in the same effort traditional artists use. If you follow a digital artist over the course of their career, they get better. If they really dedicate themselves to their craft, they create really impressive things.

Do you know what the AI peeps do to improve? Fiddle with prompts and manually edit.

Not going to knock editors. That is a skill on it's own, but you are confined to whatever the machine spits out. You don't get to experiment and spread your wings very much.

Generative AI is not an artistic tool. It was never meant to be an artistic tool. There are AI tools for artists out there, but that is completely different from letting the machine make you a picture.

I wouldn't have expected we'd reach that 'your mother' level so quickly. You started out the lowest, and that's why you won.

😂

I love the more that you get needled, the less you lean on purple prose.

Got so mad you started to actually write, did you? I wonder how long before you finally crack and do the thing you swore never to do - actually write a story without generative AI.

It’s a line from Rick and Morty where Rick was in a simulation and in order to prove to Morty that they were in a sim he says that in order to break/bug the simulation because it’s to much to compute. I said it to the ai as a joke implying that would have been to much for them to compute,

I'm open to your arguments — maybe you'll convince me with your reasoning.

😉

?si=5_rGqYomV5-kirwU