Harleen Zaftig:
It's interesting to hear that you don't think that teenage rebellion isn't a systemic feature of human development. Do you have sources for this assertion? I mean, since you asked Me for Mine...
It's interesting to hear that you don't think that teenage rebellion isn't a systemic feature of human development. Do you have sources for this assertion? I mean, since you asked Me for Mine...
Just to clarify, we said we do not think it exists, not that we think it doesn't exist. The difference is that being unconvinced of a proposition (we do not think it exists) is different from believing the opposite claim. (we think it does not exist.)
What you did here was called "shifting the burden of proof." You were asked to substantiate your claim, but instead of doing so you chose to shift the burden on us as if we are making the opposite claim.
We are not convinced this exists. We do not need a reason to be unconvinced. This isn't a reason, but to put it more simply: We have not heard an argument or seen data-driven analysis that substantiates the claim that it exists. Nor did you provide one. So we remain unconvinced.
7 hours