@canadianenglish: You're right, I have no good data on this...it's entirely based on people I encounter on the web and has no scientific validity. But I have had this impression and am curious whether others do too.
@canadianenglish, @dredhead: I should clarify. I define feedees as people who find gaining to be erotic, whether they've actually done it or not. Just as someone can be gay without having practiced gay sex, a feedee can be a feedee without having gained on purpose, a feeder can be a feeder without having encouraged someone to gain. So I would say even a conflicted feedee who has chosen not to gain is still a feedee.
If you disagree, that's fine; but please let's not turn this thread into a discussion of taxonomy! If you want to argue it, please start another thread.
13 years