Shyfeedeeguy:
I think the traditional definition of sexuality is somewhat different for those who are turned on by fat (at least, for some.) Personally, I mostly identify as asexual panromantic with a preference for feminine presenting traits... which is a way of saying I’m not into sex but I do feel romantic attraction to others, and though I don’t have a preference for gender I do always find myself attracted to women or those who are more feminine than masculine. Even trying to define asexuality can be tricky though, since for some it means never being turned on by anything ever, and for others it can mean turned on by very selective things that aren’t associated with others (like gaining.)
Even without the mutual interest we all have here on FF, sexuality is a complex thing and can be challenging to define; trying to put such into little boxes like “straight” “gay” “bi” seems ridiculous in my opinion. Don’t get me wrong, I also struggled to understand my sexuality/romantic interests for a long time and it can be confusing. Do you actually need a label though? Many people need that label because they’ve little else to define them as unique human beings or because their community/sense of community is so closely tied to their label regarding sexuality (this is based on my observations, I could be wrong.)
I think I’m basically trying to say don’t worry about it too much, labels are dumb, and do whatever makes you happy.
Now that is a good post, which makes perfect sense.
Labels are bollox we are all individuals.
