General

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

Enas:
That implies you've ignored what people other than Munchies, have said in this thread.

Plus, Munchies has already told you she is a sadist who will troll back the trolls. You don’t need to assume her motivations, she already asserted that, and her behavior aligns with it.

At this point, for me, this is litteraly just an exercise to point out the logical fallacies and inconsistencies you make.

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

Enas:
That implies you've ignored what people other than Munchies, have said in this thread.

Plus, Munchies has already told you she is a sadist who will troll back the trolls. You don’t need to assume her motivations, she already asserted that, and her behavior aligns with it.

At this point, for me, this is litteraly just an exercise to point out the logical fallacies and inconsistencies you make.

FatGTP:
That more suggests there's something wrong with your 'logic'.

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

Enas:
That implies you've ignored what people other than Munchies, have said in this thread.

Plus, Munchies has already told you she is a sadist who will troll back the trolls. You don’t need to assume her motivations, she already asserted that, and her behavior aligns with it.

At this point, for me, this is litteraly just an exercise to point out the logical fallacies and inconsistencies you make.

FatGTP:
That more suggests there's something wrong with your 'logic'.

Enas:
Elaborate please, im all ears!

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

Enas:
That implies you've ignored what people other than Munchies, have said in this thread.

Plus, Munchies has already told you she is a sadist who will troll back the trolls. You don’t need to assume her motivations, she already asserted that, and her behavior aligns with it.

At this point, for me, this is litteraly just an exercise to point out the logical fallacies and inconsistencies you make.

FatGTP:
That more suggests there's something wrong with your 'logic'.

Enas:
Elaborate please, im all ears!

FatGTP:
I would actually explain it to you if there were any chance that you truly wanted to understand me. But by now that seems out of the question.

Enas:
I dont need to understand you in order to understand if and how my logic is faulty.

Enas:
I dont need to understand you in order to understand if and how my logic is faulty.

FatGTP:
That's called a logical circularity, and that exactly illustrates where your problem lies, thanks.

Enas:
By "logical circularity" you mean this?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

Enas:
By "logical circularity" you mean this?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning


FatGTP:
The pernicious part is that you yourself are trapped in it. Even if Wikipedia explains the mechanism to you in detail, you'll struggle to recognize what it describes within your flawed thesis. That, too, is inherent to the situation.

Enas:
You failed to actually answer my question. Is what is described in the page i linked, what you meant by saying "logical circularity"?