General

Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.

Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.

SumoSized:
My guy, it shouldn't be a hot take that women shouldn't be recorded or photographed and then uploaded to a fetish site without their explicit consent. That's a massive privacy concern and it's honestly terrifying that you don't realize that

Munchies:
It's not a stupid law. It protects the people in the pictures, and it even protects you, Weetabix. I'm pretty sure the last thing you want is for people who don't like you to get ahold of your images and post them for all to see and demean.

While I do not wish this harm to befall you, these laws would give you recourse for justice. Horrible people do not discriminate. Anyone can be a victim. Hell, the laws in your country are even stricter than those in my country.

Morbidly A Beast:
I hope she sees your post you creepy incel freak racist

Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.

SumoSized:
My guy, it shouldn't be a hot take that women shouldn't be recorded or photographed and then uploaded to a fetish site without their explicit consent. That's a massive privacy concern and it's honestly terrifying that you don't realize that

Munchies:
Not just that. Seeing that Weetabix is one of those anti-establishment types, he's the last person who should be pro-spying on people. Especially since that means people could legally spy on him and all that entails.

If you can't accept it this law for altruistic reasons, then at least accept it for selfish ones.

Nofbar:
In general you can record whatever you like and do whatever you like stuff that is seen/heard in public. BUT using what you get for harassment/stalking/titilation is in general not legal

Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.

SumoSized:
My guy, it shouldn't be a hot take that women shouldn't be recorded or photographed and then uploaded to a fetish site without their explicit consent. That's a massive privacy concern and it's honestly terrifying that you don't realize that

Munchies:
Not just that. Seeing that Weetabix is one of those anti-establishment types, he's the last person who should be pro-spying on people. Especially since that means people could legally spy on him and all that entails.

If you can't accept it this law for altruistic reasons, then at least accept it for selfish ones.

Weetabix:
If you go out in public wearing something that men could wack off to but you don't want them doing so then the obvious measure is don't do that. Providing men with the material for that then punishing them afterwards is stupid and unfair. It's actually entrapment.

You don't have an expectation of privacy when in public. Where ever you go there are cameras watching and recording. Lots of doorbel cams, street cams, shop cams, traffic cams. If there was a law against it then the cameras would be removed. Generally what a camera sees the eye can see. There are cases where cameras see more than one would expect like x-ray and infrared and zoom lenses etc. One must expect those too.

There was the case where the Tesla camera was recording people inside their garage and that did break privacy laws. Outside it does not.

Nofbar:
In general you can record whatever you like and do whatever you like stuff that is seen/heard in public. BUT using what you get for harassment/stalking/titilation is in general not legal

Weetabix:
Titillation is in the mind of the beholder. Harassment is an actual activity which affects the victim, as would be stalking if they became aware of it.