Munchies:
Once again proving you still don't believe in consent. Explains your shitty take on rape earlier.
I think consent is one importand factor but as such, it has limits. For example in my decision to do write in here was informed by one other factor, in addittion to OP's request. I explained this above.
About my take on rape, i might be ignorant of things, but i haven’t actually seen my take criticised (and i mean that, merely starting that its a shitty take isn’t really productive criticism)
There have been some cis men in this thread with positive additions to this thread. None of those post have been yours. If anything, you are an excellent example as to why women and trans people can't have nice things.
Enas:
I need to understand how you made that judgement in order to consider it seriously, because right now this im suspicious you're arguing with this in bad faith.
So far, i've pointed/criticised 2 things about OP's articulation, and i also have the advice that one needs to be interogative in order to stay safe. I think those are positive contributions! And i hope to build upon them some more! O.o
SumoSized:
My brother in christ do you know what consent means? I've been trying to be lurk in this thread because I figured I had more to learn from this thread than I had to contribute but my god do I need to respond to this. OP was not "arguing" anything. They were posing a discussion amongst women, trans women, nonbinary folks, and any other vulnerable group in the feederism community because as they said in their original post demographically they are more likely to be feedees and as such they need to stay safe from men who commit acts that are sexual assault and in certain cases can be comparable to rape.
Consent to anything feederism related is absolutely mandatory. Force feedings are a form of roleplay and should be seen as such. You are not literally forcing your partner to eat against their will, there should be a safe word involved and if the feedee or hell even the feeder feels uncomfortable they have the right to immediately stop and revoke consent. And secret feedings should be entirely off the table as there is zero consent involved.
There is no "both sides-ing" either of those things. Consent is required and that is what OP wanted to discuss with others in their particular position. Now considering we're both men and are not in any of the groups OP was addressing in their original post let's withdraw from the conversation and allow this forum thread to continue as it was intended to be.
Stuffytummywriter:
I love that you spoke up and tried but after 6 (SIX!!!!!!!!) entire pages of essentially one shitty dude mansplaining why his little opinion is worth taking away allllll the space from women (and nb and trans dudes), women, by the by, HE HASN'T EVEN HEARD YET because no one had a chance to contribute on-topic because of him... this thread is dead in the water. another attempt at women trying to look out for one another destroyed by men
It's still salvageable if we all collectively ignore Enas. He has nothing to contribute, he keeps rehashing talking points scores of people have explained to him why they are shitty for years, and it's clear her has no interest in improving.
He's a lost cause, and we should treat him as such. Don't give him power he isn't entitled to.
With that said, I think it's safe to say most of us see secret feedings as rape. So now let's talk about how we can keep vulnerable groups safer.
