I find myself in a similar position to the four years of fun formerly known as high school. Having chosen to enter the forums again and taken the same stance I tend to, as it turns out my opinion is far less acceptable to FF's body. My temper having slipped finally, it seems high time I draw this matter to its end and vanish for a while.
From what I've gathered in reading and studying the threads on attraction and their subsiquent divergence into the mechanics of relationships, it is the standing fact of this site's main body that relationships are first and foremost centered on sex, with any sort of emotional or sentimental components being mere pretext or justification. Science having already laid clear biochemestry and mechanics something to that effect, fine, I'll concede that point fully.
"Nice" being a personality type that has been sighted for being both a sign of sexual ineptitude, incapacity, or general failure with the fairer sex, I at least wish to see if any will concede that point that for however pathetic in romantic affairs, they are necessary to keep the world running.
With their political correctness and overall easily tolerable personalities, "nice" or "normal" people act as the grease or berrings; furthermore, for however little it[personality] may be of value in the sack, I would still argue that the general traits implied with a "nice" personality are easiest to co-exist with between romantic interludes.
Does anyone agree with me now?
From what I've gathered in reading and studying the threads on attraction and their subsiquent divergence into the mechanics of relationships, it is the standing fact of this site's main body that relationships are first and foremost centered on sex, with any sort of emotional or sentimental components being mere pretext or justification. Science having already laid clear biochemestry and mechanics something to that effect, fine, I'll concede that point fully.
"Nice" being a personality type that has been sighted for being both a sign of sexual ineptitude, incapacity, or general failure with the fairer sex, I at least wish to see if any will concede that point that for however pathetic in romantic affairs, they are necessary to keep the world running.
With their political correctness and overall easily tolerable personalities, "nice" or "normal" people act as the grease or berrings; furthermore, for however little it[personality] may be of value in the sack, I would still argue that the general traits implied with a "nice" personality are easiest to co-exist with between romantic interludes.
Does anyone agree with me now?
13 years