15 years
Relgious f.a's?
Hmm, interesting thread, but I would have like to have seen more discussion about the original topic rather then just another debate about the value of religion. 
So, religious peoples, how does feederism (or whatever aspect of the fetish you're into) NOT conflict with your faith?
I mean pigging out, feeling full, getting fat, satisfying lust, they all kinda sound like things religion would frown upon, no?
So, religious peoples, how does feederism (or whatever aspect of the fetish you're into) NOT conflict with your faith?
I mean pigging out, feeling full, getting fat, satisfying lust, they all kinda sound like things religion would frown upon, no?
13 years
Relgious f.a's?
I don't base my decisions on what other people do, if they have come that conclusion then more power to them. But I must also bring up that compared to the atheists or agnostic (or whatever variations there may be) scientific population that list seems tiny. At least for modern times now that you won't be executed for not following the state's religion
Logically is there no god? I didn't say that.
I say that logically it seems a bit daft to believe a contradictory work that is thousands of years old with nothing backing it up but people thumping it telling you "it's the word of GOD, deal with it."
Logically is there no god? I didn't say that.
I say that logically it seems a bit daft to believe a contradictory work that is thousands of years old with nothing backing it up but people thumping it telling you "it's the word of GOD, deal with it."
13 years
Relgious f.a's?
Moonchild wrote
[edit] To answer Maximum's question, which I hope others answer as well, it actually is something that I think about pretty constantly. I think that most of what I feel is mandated or influenced by my religious beliefs is stuff that others here would just think of as common sense, but I don't think I'm able to remove myself from its context. First of all, I believe very strongly in personal autonomy, and therefore as a feeder I would hope to never be in conflict with my hypothetical feedee's own desires for her own body.
Also, all the stuff you mentioned, Max - the indulgence, satisfying lust, etc... I don't see anything wrong with them inherently. But I do also believe that the ideal way to be would be to be able to do without them. I don't see indulgence itself as wrong, but I do see it as something that you can quickly become addicted to. Ideally, you should be able to be just as happy without it as with it. That's difficult. Frankly, it doesn't even make sense, since it pretty much means the dissolution of preferences altogether. But I also don't beat myself up for falling short of it. I see working toward that goal as far more good than not yet having reached it is bad. So basically, what I do have, I should love with all my heart, but should it be taken away, I shouldn't mourn my loss, but rather just say "okay, my situation has changed, and now I don't have (satisfaction of lust/indulgence/whatever)" without it being pejorative.
Blarg, I've got more, but it's late and I gotta go to bed.
[edit] To answer Maximum's question, which I hope others answer as well, it actually is something that I think about pretty constantly. I think that most of what I feel is mandated or influenced by my religious beliefs is stuff that others here would just think of as common sense, but I don't think I'm able to remove myself from its context. First of all, I believe very strongly in personal autonomy, and therefore as a feeder I would hope to never be in conflict with my hypothetical feedee's own desires for her own body.
Also, all the stuff you mentioned, Max - the indulgence, satisfying lust, etc... I don't see anything wrong with them inherently. But I do also believe that the ideal way to be would be to be able to do without them. I don't see indulgence itself as wrong, but I do see it as something that you can quickly become addicted to. Ideally, you should be able to be just as happy without it as with it. That's difficult. Frankly, it doesn't even make sense, since it pretty much means the dissolution of preferences altogether. But I also don't beat myself up for falling short of it. I see working toward that goal as far more good than not yet having reached it is bad. So basically, what I do have, I should love with all my heart, but should it be taken away, I shouldn't mourn my loss, but rather just say "okay, my situation has changed, and now I don't have (satisfaction of lust/indulgence/whatever)" without it being pejorative.
Blarg, I've got more, but it's late and I gotta go to bed.
Thanks, nice to see someone isn't totaly caught up in a holy war here.
13 years
