How to date an overweight white american woman ?

Enas:
I think it boils down to two things:

First, make sure she is a competent person. (A heck of a lot of peopel aren't competent at all i think, so thats something to be concerned about.)

Then, just be blunt about it, but at the same time, make sure to not get her uncomfortable. Put the things you wanna communicate to her i a proper order, from first to last.

Munchies:
Just because you are competent does not mean you are compatible.


Right, thats the third thing!
2 hours

How to date an overweight white american woman ?

I think it boils down to two things:

First, make sure she is a competent person. (A heck of a lot of peopel aren't competent at all i think, so thats something to be concerned about.)

Then, just be blunt about it, but at the same time, make sure to not get her uncomfortable. Put the things you wanna communicate to her i a proper order, from first to last.
4 hours

Artist looking for work!

Enas:
Im doing digital Art. I can help you with whatever you like when it comes to 2D. Do you have a Graphics pen tablet?

Munchies:
It's weird to offer assistance when an artists didn't request it.


OMG i didn't read the post's title xD

I assumed he wanted help in regards to knowledge 😅
4 hours

Artist looking for work!

Im doing digital Art. I can help you with whatever you like when it comes to 2D. Do you have a Graphics pen tablet?
8 hours

Spread the knowledge

Munchies:
...
what's something you wish you knew before you dipped your toes into feedism
...


What counts as "dipping my toes into feedism"?

Im asking because it seems like there is really nothing that would be of much importance to feedism.

For example what you described in your last paragraph, it has to do with relationships, and the communication in them, far more than it has to do with feedism.
2 days

Exes who got huge…

Archibold789:
Is that not the nature of threads and forum posts? Pose a question, get some feedback. I’m not interested in other people’s exes at all. It’s a situational query.


Yes. All the replies your post has gotten are feedback. Also, what exactly do you mean with "situational query?"

Why do you guys immediately jump to concluding that I want other people’s stories or dirty details? I don’t. It was (what I thought) just a question of generality.


Because you provided sufficient information for people to do so. Your post asks if other people have experienced their exs going through a sexual transformation. This is definetely asking for other peoples' stories, and since its about a sexual fetish, its "dirty" too.

I guess topics having to do with exes is too triggering because there is a lot of projection that I have nothing to do with coming my way. I’m merely interested in anything that may have to do with what I’m dealing with. No ill will. No fishing. Certainly no “trolling”. Just a typical question that has snowballed into a shit show for some reason.

Like c’mon guys. This is bizarre.


No, its because people understand there is something wrong with it, but dont have precise enough language for it.
4 days

Exes who got huge…

Archibold789:
Fair enough. Thank you for responding with something other than conjecture. I’ll state the question again:

“Anybody have an ex who was (or wasn’t) into feedism and ended up getting huge after the breakup?”

Same as when I posted it initially. The implied or inferred question being…has this happened to anyone else? I was never sure if my ex was into feedism but she sure seems like she is now.

Things just went from 0 to 100 real quick with people assuming there was some kind of coercion involved. I don’t feel the need to break down every fine point of my situation because A) I’m not obligated to when the first remark is pithy and seemingly “anti-ex” or something and B ) I honestly felt like it was a straightforward question.


I was not aware of the rabid, finger-pointing nature in the forums. I’m hoping it just a couple of bad eggs but jeez. Being called “r*pey” or “toxic” is well within bounds for defense when nothing I said alluded to that at all.

Again, this is pretty common question in feedism circles online and for some reason it’s uh…well I don't even know what it is here. Seems like FF is being held hostage by a bunch of ill-intended bullies who are looking for something to shit on.

ALSO again I attempted this in good faith. So much for that.


In your reply you dont really answer that particular question that i talked about. What makes you interested in other peoples exs so that you come to ask a question that has to do with them?
4 days

Exes who got huge…

Canuck:
trolling for stories about exes is just creepy in and of itself. there's no consent, and it just cries out for something bordering on revenge.

here's my advice: get over your ex. move on. do it silently, if you can. if you struggle with that, try just not waste a lot of time talking about people who are no longer in your life.

now, if your question is something unrelated to that, then rephrase your question.


Oh, you were ahead of me! Nice!
4 days

Exes who got huge…

Canuck:
...
everyone who has responded told you: it's creepy!
...


That's an ad populum fallacy.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

(the fact that many people think or say something doesn’t make it true)

Most importantly, its already apparent if one just reads through the thread. Mentioning doesn't add any value. What will add value is giving a reason for why that is the case.
4 days

Exes who got huge…

Archibold789:


Why do you care that I care? Maybe it’s more nuanced than you know.


Just for the record. If we accept that the initial post is, vaguelly speaking, normal (vaguelly speaking because... what counts as "normal"?), then your reaction here is the first problem in this thread. You evaded the question and consequently left it unanswered.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-sides_model

Munchies asked the question you evaded in order to get a clear idea of the self-revealing part of what you communicate in the begining. Specifically, what is the motive for you to bring other people's exes (as oposed to, say for example, themselves)?

You should answer this question so people can better judge by themselves if they want to participate in the thread or not. (For most people that is a matter of if you come across as suspicious zto them, something reinforced by you evading to answer the question.)

Edit to include:
In public discource, which a thread is, it doesn’t matter so much if the person asking you a question is toxic or not. You generally should answer regardless, if you are able, for other people who might also follow the conversation you're participating in.
4 days
12345   loading