Fantasy Feeder

Getting turned on writing a fat fetish story

Been writing smut since I was 13. So yes. Its my primary outlet when I'm single. Used to read a lot, but it so hard to find what I actually looked for based on descriptions, that eventually I just mostly started writing my own. Still not great - my writing is mediocre at best - but better than random stories even with descriptions and tags.

7 months

Nok

How would this experiment go?

Fundingfeeder:
I’d wear it when I went to the gym. Just to be a persistent temptation

HAHA frickin genius!! I might write a story like this, ftl

10 months

Nok

I'm just looking or anyone to talk on here

omg epically toxic

1 year

Nok

Feedee regret

Munchies:
I see a lot of posts on this site lamenting female feedees and gainers that don't have a fat kink. I am curious to know your thoughts on male feeders that don't have a fat fetish, but are looking for vulnerable women.

They are worse than human garbage, bordering on being truly evil. There are obligate predators, people like serial killers that are driven to do evil, but in the same way that I'm driven to eat chocolate or maybe someone with tourettes is driven to tick. As a society, we need to remove them, but their "evil" is overblown.

Then there are facultative predators and opportunists, people that do evil because they think it's fun and their bored or because it is moderately easier than something else (or, tbf, because they had it modelled for them by other people in their lives, friends, parents, etc.). People that intentionally cause pain and damage and are not "unwillingly" evil. Those people are truly among the worst humanity has to offer, imho, and I'd say the group you describe falls in that category.

1 year

Nok

Is anyone else tired of this?

Hydrogen:
“Oh sorry I don’t do that…" And she’s gone.”

AskDrFeeder:
Sorry you're tired of it, but I think you're both at fault; her for not saying up front she needs financing and you for not saying up front that you don't do that.

Nok:
Are you suggesting that in this day and age, it may be necessary to say up front on social profiles that you aren't interested in giving money to strangers on the internet, that you're actually seeking a genuine connection and not a financial transaction?

I am not disagreeing, I've just never thought of that.

In fact, though it seems burdensome and dystopian... it may not be a bad idea, in some form.

Letters And Numbers:
I think it’s pretty common advice for people dating online to be extremely up front with people before you get into things. Like if you’re looking for a partner for marriage and children, etc, say that early and often. You might rule out people who are looking for something different and avoid wasting both of your time.

So yeah, maybe that’s dystopian, but that’s where we are.

This is a tricky site because it’s a little bit of everything. If it was just a porn site, you would expect that most people would be buying or selling. If it was just a dating site you wouldn’t expect people to be just looking for friends or just be looking for free porn or erotica. But it’s all of that and it doesn’t do some of it well. So yeah, I think being upfront is important.

Good point

1 year

Nok

Is anyone else tired of this?

Also, there's a good point touched on here, which is that the flipside to people asking others for money in exchange for content, is people asking for content in exchange for money, or, more often and somewhat ruder, asking for content for free, and then being abusive when it isn't taken well.

Just in terms of rounding out the discussion.

1 year

Nok

Is anyone else tired of this?

LoraDayton:
I'm tired of men coming here and blatantly complaining about their own lack of deduction and social skills. Gee, must suck to be poor.

Sure can't imagine what it would be like to be viewed only as an object, spoken to with outright derision, expected to be *grateful* for the "Attraction" of people who are so ashamed of their attraction that they won't show themselves while *also* expecting a "connection," constantly harassed, ignored, fetishized without consent, and also harangued for *more* content, and sometimes even threatened for not providing said validation/content/companionship, while also making substantially less on average than most people who come here with cake/food/fat art as a pfp and dare complain about someone... suggesting that if you *want* more of the content, that they too may need to be compensated for it.

So, nah.

I'm not entirely sure what you're saying, but I think I agree with you. I mean, the point about claiming to seek connection on a fetish forum while hiding your face out of "shame"... isn't easily discarded. I mean, reality is that society would frown on you whether you're personally ashamed or not, so hiding may just be prudent. But still, the spirit of your assertion seems very valid. If you cater to reality in hiding your face, you should accept the reality that people will do whatever they need to to make money, including intentions-catfishing. It's just just business in that way, they're not scamming, they're advertising and building report with potential customers.

1 year

Nok

Is anyone else tired of this?

Hydrogen:
“Oh sorry I don’t do that…" And she’s gone.”

AskDrFeeder:
Sorry you're tired of it, but I think you're both at fault; her for not saying up front she needs financing and you for not saying up front that you don't do that.

Are you suggesting that in this day and age, it may be necessary to say up front on social profiles that you aren't interested in giving money to strangers on the internet, that you're actually seeking a genuine connection and not a financial transaction?

I am not disagreeing, I've just never thought of that.

In fact, though it seems burdensome and dystopian... it may not be a bad idea, in some form.

1 year

Nok

Sighting: see evidence of wg that is a turn-on

Morbidly A Beast:

I am going to try and reply seriously here, despite the manner in which you are speaking coming across as trolling and vitriol.

There seems to be a lot of conflation occurring here, as there are actually several topics being discussed synonymously, erroneously.

Afai can tell, most revolve around consent:

Is consent necessary for you to have a sexual thought about a person or notice them in a sexual way?

Is consent necessary for you to choose to spend voluntary time thinking about someone?

Is consent necessary to discuss someone in a fetishistic forum without identifying information?

Is consent necessary to engage with someone in a fetishistic way?

Is consent necessary to post pictures of someone up online without their consent, fetishistic or not?

Along which of these does society gain the most benefit in regulating, which are most feasible, etc.?

Perhaps if we all focus on these questions as separate, rather than one mountain worth dying on, more common ground may be found, with less anger and rancor.

1 year

Nok

Sighting: see evidence of wg that is a turn-on

Morbidly A Beast:
fucking sick freaks.

That's absolutely unacceptable. Why are you here? Why would you post something like that? Are you incapable of thinking before you speak? You must understand, behavior like this colors everything you will ever comment again - it makes it impossible to take you seriously, to see you as anything other than a fool or a troll. Please learn to act like an adult if you want to participate in civil adult discussions.

1 year

Nok