Hi, if you check the other thread you made, we already gave you advice about orexigenic medications. There are basically no OTC orexigenic medications.
All orexigenic substances are pretty heavy on effecting the brain. The only thing marginally accessible or safe is cannabis, and YMMV on its orexigenic properties.
1 month
There are very few to no orexigenic compounds available OTC.
If you live somewhere that has legalised it, cannabis is known to stimulate appetite in most consumers.
The only low-side-effect potential orexigenics are generation 1 H1 anti-histamines, and they definitely still have side-effects. They are also all prescription only, in the US, and have higher blood-brain permeability than their OTC counterparts. So, we do not recommend.
Wikipedia has a fantastic list of orexigenics, and it shows what is essentially a long, long list of prescription-only medications. They also almost all have some potentially nasty side-effects.
1 month
Torchcacti:
It’s hard to explain what I mean, so it might not be worth much in this convo, but I feel like Freud’s idea of “polymorphous perversity,” despite whatever negative connotations come with the word “perverse,” is much more true to my experience as a child than any other theories I’ve heard.
Freud was ultimately not a reliable source of info for anything about how the mind functions, and almost all of his work has been discredited multiple times over throughout the replicability crisis.
Evolution is an a-rational process that produces emergences in an unguided manner. Rationality is a thing we use as a tool to unravel causal connections, but it is far from the only tool. Instincts are, by their very nature, not rational because they evolved without regard to rationality. Kita thinks you have mistaken an explanation of causality that uses rationality as a tool to determine the chain for the processes being rational themselves.
That said, since we are emergent from natural, evolutionary processes, and Kita herself has no spiritual or religious beliefs, she can find no causal relationship between kink and its subjects *but* evolutionary processes. Like how our digestive systems evolved, so did our brains. And they did so without regards to our tools of understanding that would come far later.
(Minor edit for formatting error and typo.)
1 month
Agreed! It would *invaluable* to kink spaces to have some good data, especially for encouraging safe and best practices.
Just having more hard info on how to gain would be awesome. Developing medicine to help us be safer in kink practice would be a boon, too.
1 month
It's not a study. Nor do we have the data publically accessible. We just keep tabs on the community we personally run. It isn't feederism related, but because Kita runs it she has had her parade of (ex-)girlfriends through it.
Sorry to disappoint.
1 month
In our experience, feederism and neurodivergence almost overlap 1:1. But Kita's selection is biased, as being into hard science and video games means almost everyone she meets is a bit neurospicy.
1 month
For all of Kita's searching over the past 18 years, she has been unable to find real, definitive, conclusive data about... most kinks. Academia is mostly uninterested. It's not that nothing exists as far as data, just not anywhere near enough for proper meta analysis, nor any analysis worth a damn, in our opinion.
If we had to take a stab, survival and reproduction instincts are really deeply ingrained in all mammals; and as particularly social ones, acts that are pro-social like sharing food or being vulnerable with one another often can be related to attraction. Anti-social behaviours seen as taboo can cross disgust thresholds that are closely related to brain structures involved in determining sexual attraction or stimulation.
All this is to say that feeding being pro-social, and being fat having social consequences, probably influences a lot of the early stimulation of neural pathways related to attraction/sex; and these pathways are like grooves in a record, getting deeper as they are accessed and dominating more of the energy transference in that region.
1 month
This is actually two suggestions:
1) The ability to filter who our profile can be displayed to, similar to the criteria we can use for searching for profiles. IE A lesbian may wish to hide their profile from men, or a feedee may wish to hide their profile from other feedees.
2) Adding sexuality to the site chat's dropdown profiles in the user list. Just to stop people from barking up the wrong trees, unannounced.
1 month
Hi! This is, somewhat up our alley, but we're trans. If that is a dealbreaker, no need to reply.
That said, we're into the hardcore stuff and even the slob aesthetic, but we're not into humiliation/degradation/name-calling, so if that's a dealbreaker also, no need to reply.
If not, then hit Kita up.
1 month
If you wanna quit, just quit and leave us alone. : D
1 month