Several people have reported an appetite bump that occurred when they hit 300.
Anyone else?
12 years
Lying in bed with my (now-ex) wife one morning I felt her hip and realized it was chunkier. Wondered if she'd gained weight and reached around to see if she was getting a tummy...
she was!
12 years
One caveat:
The biggest risk is not so much hitting a specific weight. It's getting so into this that you literally CAN'T stop gaining.
From talking to feedees it seems to me the key factor in becoming unable to stop is: Stuffing to the max too often. That is, stuffing to the point you can't take a deep breath.
If you stuff to the max once a week or more you may not be able to stop gaining.
Of course, you MAY be able to stop gaining even if you stuff like that, and you may be unable to stop even if you don't.
It's just a correlation I've noticed.
12 years
Those calorie calculators are often way off. Just because you eat a certain amount of calories doesn't mean you can digest that many.
Perhaps you could keep track of your calories and exercise and weight and derive a formula that is relevant for YOU.
Or you could just gain until you decide to stop. Be prepared to overshoot though...it's hard to stop on a dime!
Personally the ideal size for a woman is usually as big as she can get and still get around fairly easily. When the weight becomes crippling it's less than ideal.
I love the Evil Feeder fantasy but irl? No.
12 years
In my opinion 1) you are gaining intentionally; 2) you will eventually weigh more than 200 pounds.
Bon appetit!
12 years
LovesBigMen wrote:
I've never been open about my feedism before on a relationship, but I don't see how it could ultimately work if both of us aren't into this.
Yes but:
1. How will you know the other person's into it if you don't tell them you are?
2. Maybe they can learn to be into it. Has happened.
12 years
SexyPhat wrote:I love your words for these things. THE COMMANDER haha I'm a brusher though
Hey, you gotta start somewhere!
12 years
fatawakening wrote:AskDrFeeder wrote:
I know it's just for fun but I feel compelled to point ask anyway:
Why is the feedee is the only one with responsibilities??
A record company sent me a contract once that had 15 ways they could screw me and only one clause where they accepted a few very limited responsibilities on their part.
This is even worse!
Where would you improve it and how would you go about a contract for a feeder?
Got me there. I've tried to write contracts like this in the past and always get bogged down.
I think if it's a short-term relationship--on the order of a month or less--a contract is not required. Common civility is sufficient.
If it's a long-term relationship it should be based on love, not feeding. Feeding and gaining should not be requirements, just side-benefits. If you want a contract, the standard marriage contract should do!
12 years
