imo that actually is great motivation to not only clean up, but add chapters to popular stories.

if you're concerned about folks just adding a word or two, change the criteria to only move them up if the length has expanded considerably or at least one new chapter has been added.

b

post new with a link to the earlier "chapters"

my .02

realism always strikes an arousing chord

but if it's an interesting outrageously kinky
fantasy that turns you on, go for it

built4com4t

info is unfortunately buried. go here...

fantasyfeeder.com/cms/infusions/help/view.php

should be a link to it top of the stories page.

built4com4t

stays buried

extremely disappointing since the photo and video galleries here all update as items are added.

as roundandpear noted, rather than add a chapter to an existing story and essentially waste your time, create a new story with a bac*** in the introduction.

quick fap

but that's just how some of us shallow,
non-romantic males like our buttons pushed.

easier to write, too.

try writing shorter stories...small, ultra detailed vignettes.

if you have an interesting ending or series of endings you like, try working backwards from each...editing as the story evolves.

basically just start writing and let the words flow, go for quantity rather than quality...don't try for perfection first time out and don't be afraid to edit.

b

thanks again for all your hard work hiccupx, and for giving us a place to explore and share our deepest darkest fantasies.

i second most of the comments here, in particular the suggestion that stories edited or chapters added to resurface.

too often otherwise excellent stories that are thoughtfully massaged or expanded (no pun intended) remain buried and go unnoticed.

b

that's cool omigumo

however it sounds like what's been proposed is now (are now?) two different session themes...your public q&a, sort of a virtual book signing/ego inflation...and the one edit first described (and what i have been referring to), that of a fa fetish writer workshop where ideas and technique would be tossed around.

of the two i'm inclined toward the latter.

i suggest a poll of some of the other story contributers...see what they would prefer.

you misunderstand omigumo...the suggestion to not broadcast openly but invite privately was to enhance the quality of the event and make it more productive and constructive for the participants. i have no desire to participate if non-writers and non-contributers are there to interject, comment and interrupt. secondly, the subjects under discussion should be allowed to be as graphic as need be, without crude slang or language. thirdly, i was kidding about the big bucks.