What's the fun of that?

Sorry Softly, but if you're worried about whether you're cool or not...

...you're not!

No kidding!

Yes!

This is quite a can of worms! It runs into a lot of "nanny state" and "welfare state" issues as well as social stigmas and stereotypes.

You should write a book!

I like that you ask what "health" is! I never really thought about it much, but it is complex. E.g., Who was healthier: the person who was never sick, never in the hospital, always had full mobility and full possession of his faculties until dropping dead at 70 or the miserable, sickly, bed-bound, dementia patient who hangs on until 75?

If you need to do this to get along, fine, but I think it would be better if you could admit you have NO interest in losing weight or stopping.

If we have to have an apocalypse with no hope of anyone surviving, I guess maybe I'd take the Vampire apocalypse. There's something satisfying about them all starving to death after wiping us out.

I'd really prefer no apocalypse at all, but I'd take the zombie apocalypse over a vampire or dragon one. Zombies seem pretty easy to defeat, really. Vampires are tougher, and dragons like to burn you alive.

But the one I'm really afraid of is the fundamentalist religious apocalypse*. That one might actually happen!

*Not the one predicted in the Bible--just being taken over by fundamentalist ideologues.

That's fine, but that's not the Evil Feeder fantasy.

An Evil Feeder does not give his victim a choice. He kidnaps her, imprisons her, and enslaves her.

This is illegal everywhere (as far as I know!) And immoral, as you're taking away someone's freedom and taking them away from their family and friends. And impractical, as it's very hard to take care a of a prisoner like this. What about dental care, health care, nosy neighbors?

This is why the Evil Feeder fantasy, while physically possible, will usually be and should always be just a fantasy.