Vidarr:
I'm actively gaining and I reached a weight of 135kg in 2 years, from a starting weight of 85kg.
But in the past months I got stuck at this weight without gaining.
I've been less active so my guesses are that I'm losing muscle and having fat simultaneously.
Does someone know how to continue to gain?

Olga01:
Munchies:
If you are discussing things in a religion's Holy Book, you are discussing the religion. Same with the Quran, the Vedas, the Tripitaka, or the Book of Shadows.

Oh, really. And if one says that mention of Israeli bears and chariots in Old Testament prove that there were bears and chariots in iron age Israel, it means discussing the religion. The Holy Book , I conclude, has a magic to make a religious matter of any thing mentioned in it and referred to in any context?

And if one says that mention of feet, pounds and inches in mathematician textbook of 19th century proves that these measures of length and weight were in usage at this time, it means discussing mathematics, because mathematician textbook makes mathematics of all things mentioned in it. Etc.

In any case, no one is obliged to recognize any scripture of any religion to be really 'Holy'. It depends on his personal faith.

Munchies:
Hi. I'm Christian. What is your point?

It's called basic human decency. If something is not your religion, don't be rude about it - especially when it is clear that you do not understand the ins and outs of it.

I don't care if you are not Christian. I don't care if you have critiques of my faith. I do care if you are boldly making claims on things without understanding the text. Now knock it off.

Bigdoug:
Not every discussion or mention of a passage from a “holy book” is about religion or religious interpretation. Especially the OT has been used frequently as a reference to the history and culture of the Middle East and its tribes. It is also a historical text existing in historical context! I found the mention of the ancient SSBBWs interesting and it was news to me. So I learned something. What was not new to me was the abysmal, hypocritical and mysoginistic treatment of these women at the hands of religious fanatics, hence my dislike of religion!

Morbidly A Beast:
saw a similar post on Reddit
www.reddit.com/r/WeightGainTalk/comments/1jqxq5l/i_23m_saw_my_mom_on_feabie_help/

Seems fake to me. The probability on that seems rather low givin how few feedists there are.

Olga01:
Munchies:
If you are discussing things in a religion's Holy Book, you are discussing the religion. Same with the Quran, the Vedas, the Tripitaka, or the Book of Shadows.

Oh, really. And if one says that mention of Israeli bears and chariots in Old Testament prove that there were bears and chariots in iron age Israel, it means discussing the religion. The Holy Book , I conclude, has a magic to make a religious matter of any thing mentioned in it and referred to in any context?

And if one says that mention of feet, pounds and inches in mathematician textbook of 19th century proves that these measures of length and weight were in usage at this time, it means discussing mathematics, because mathematician textbook makes mathematics of all things mentioned in it. Etc.

In any case, no one is obliged to recognize any scripture of any religion to be really 'Holy'. It depends on his personal faith.

.

And yes, saying "man" is obsolete by several centuries.

Olga01:
I definitely think that 1962 was not several centuries ago
E.g.
archive.org/details/manhisdestinying0000sgfb
This book by a pious specialist in religions it's not about males, it's about mankind / human beings.

Olga01:
Once more, I'm not dealing with religion. If we see in Bible mention of bears in Israel (I mean the story how two bears killed 42 children who were mocking the prophet Elisha,
"there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them" ), it's just as if any other ancient source mentions bears in Israel. It just gives us info about geographical distribution of bears in those times, independently of the religious matters. The religious or moral meaning of this story is quite another thing.

Same here. From this Amos prophecy we learn about fat fashion in Israel of 8th century BC. It is not about religion. It is his attitude to this fashion and these women that is about his ideas, including religious ones, but I didn't discuss this attitude. I quoted list of those details about these women that one can derive from his text as source.

I apologize for the fact I used word man, but I want to emphasize that I didn't meant "male", I just meant any person. Maybe it's obsolete practice.

Olga01:
1. I'm not dealing with religion. I quoted analysis of Old Testament text just as one of many ancient texts,

2. Losch, whose comments I have presented, is religious man , religious teacher and even priest himself. The scholars, whose comments I have presented, are secular scholars. But are they think about the women from this text the same that Losch thinks .

Different opinions exist only on the precise meaning of threats to these women. I quoted some explanations with arguments (not my ones) in favor of them. If you have other plausible interpretations of this meaning, you are strongly welcomed to tell them, just as any other men who has any opinion on this point.

Bubbingscrubbles:
So like, to preface, I’ve never hidden my partners from my fam and I’m sure my fam can kinda tell I have a type. My family however doesn’t know that I intentionally gained 140 pounds for fetish reasons. Lmao I learned from my girlfriend that my ex told my sister in law (bro’s wife). I’m not like upset, however I’m mildly embarrassed about it. There’s only two things in life that can embarrass me and my folks knowing that is one. 😅

Thankfully she’s cool about it, but like she’s the sister I never knew I wanted and we’re total partners in crime. I’m also 1000% lucky to have my girlfriend in my life who is also very open and welcoming of my kinks, so long as I’m healthy (actually have been losing weight for health reasons). However I still kinda wanna crawl in a hole and disappear 😂😂😂

Anyone else have anything similar so I don’t feel like the only one in this boat? Lol

Olga01:
Do we want to learn more about fat admiration and ssbbws in various times and cultures, from any source which can provide this information,

or do we want to use only such sources, whose authors share our own positions? The second option would be absurd. there are many things in history which we can learn about only through sources which were written by haters of these things.

We have no sources written by those fat admirers of Samaria and by those women of Samaria, but we can learn about them through things which Amos writes about them. I definitely think that to learn about these people from their hater is much better than not to learn about them at all.

That's why I don't understand the reprimand declaring that material which I quoted doesn't add anything. It adds bright information about huge and luxurious ssbbws of Samaria, and about those who loved them, appreciated them and were their enablers. It would be very strange, if such an information would be accepted as offopic here, I think.

Bigdoug:
That’s exactly why I am not religious! These quotes cited by the OP depict extremely fat women in a very negative light and seemingly enjoy their cruel treatment. Mysoginistic bs as far as I am concerned. Goes right along with declaring gluttony a deadly sin. As a fat man and husband of a fat woman I find that very offensive!

Olga01:
Yes, but for me it's interesting not the fact that Amos hates these women, but the fact that they existed and that Northern Israel people loved them and pampered them. We have info about this fact only through Amos with his hatred.

Munchies:
That's not why he was mad. He was mad that they were taking food from the mouths of those without. This is a class and corruption issue.

Olga01:
He was mad really in literal sense of the word. Food consumption of elite cant " take food " from the mouths of common peoole. Even in egalitarian bands of hunters-gatherers of Magdalenian paleolitic Europe 20 000 years ago women could gain weight up to epic proportions. And there was no society in the world history where elite could be costy for main part of the people because of its food consumption.

Munchies:
*le deep sigh*

How about you stop talking about something you do not fully understand.

I have read Amos in full numerous times. I am very familiar with the text. Yes, there is misogyny about how he is addressing them. However, it is not the fatness itself that is the problem. He spells it out very plainly.

Olga01:
Oh oh yes, it is terrible terrible oppression with which the husbands of these women overburdened the poor laboring masses, in order to provide for these women food and wine! Of course, all we know that slim women and husbands of slim women can't overexploitate poor people, only fat ones and their husbands can!

If Amos would have ever meant anything you try to ascribe to him, he wouldn't mention fatness at all. In this case he would just express indignation for overexploitation of people by elite without any mentioning of body type of exploitators, as it is totally irrelevant to degree of exploitation. Moreover, in this case he would speak not about women but about men, because women were not property owners and could not exploitate people at all.

You can try to make any kind of communist or friend of the poor people of this religious antihedonistic fanatic, but it will be a useless attempt.
The same biblical prophets express very brightly that the vast masses of the people hated their ideas and their threats and mocked them. It is hard to reconcile this fact with the idea that Amos and company were great champions of poor laborers, oppressed by greedy upper classes.