Weetabix:
"Please do not go around spreading misinformation."
Words to live by, yet you don't follow your own advice.
Munchies:
I cited my sources. Where are yours?
Weetabix:
Your sources are the problem, they're dis-info.
You claim that most medical interventions are successful but that's like claiming most times you drive through a red traffic light nothing bad happens.
Most people who had the jab survived thus far.
The medical profession is shameful and corrupt. Citing sources simply shows the saturation of the corruption. Disgusting.
I still see a lack of sources. Which means your sources are "trust me bro" and "I made it up."
The moment you start attacking the other person and cannot provide evidence of your claims is the moment you've lost the arguement. That's debate 101.
Do you know why I'm always so cocksure when I make a post? It's because a take the time to double check what I know and research the information to make things more coherant. I made the mistake of not doing that once.
Once.
And I was wrong. The other person was very kind about it, but it humbled me so bad. Never made that mistake again.
Here's the thing. If you say, "I had this problem, and this worked for me," that's fine. Everyone shares anecdotal evidence all the time. But if someone says something that you disagree with, then you better be able to back up why.
And if you can't then it's better to say nothing. Because if you can't back up what you say, no one will listen to you. At least people who can think critically.