jeepster42 wrote:
I'm going CRAZY? Anyone else in the same boat? It's so ridiculous--I'm VERY good at what I do....why can't I get a frickin' JOB???
Because the rich folks have changed the rules to benefit rich folks. Don't blame yourself.
14 years
Personally AskMrFeeder I don't really like your design as it looks too much like existing smiley faces, if you walked past someone and saw it you would probably think its the usually smiley face that people wear.
The difference would be hard to spot if your not really close.
Yeah, I think you're right...but as I said, I'm no artist. It could be done a bit better.
On the other hand, some people might want it to be subtle.
14 years
More ideas:
Feedee -- fork pointing towards face
Feeder -- fork pointing away from face
Mutual Gaining -- Twin forks pointing both ways
Foodee -- Happy face with a double chin
FA -- Heart containing happy face with a double chin
I'm not an artist but this will give you a rough idea:
14 years
chubbyhoney wrote:
We can comment on this without getting rude or personal.
Agreed.
Everyone's opinions are as valid as the next persons.
I don't agree. For example, if your opinion were that the Earth is flat, your opinion would be less valid than mine.
14 years
It's not clear to me whether this is abusive feeding or not.
What would make it abusive would be if heilkibler's gf really has no idea she's overeating. This is possible but unlikely.
The other thing that would make it abusive is if she's expressed concern about her weight-gain, or how much she's been eating, or if she's explicitly asked hk to stop encouraging her to eat. In this case hk's only ethical course would be to abide by her wishes and not encourage her to overeat--unless he admits he wants her to gain, and gets her to agree to gain more.
14 years
You could add the eating emoticon:
:G
(See how it looks like someone putting food in their mouth? Plus that "G" for "Gluttony"
14 years
@canadianenglish: You're right, I have no good data on this...it's entirely based on people I encounter on the web and has no scientific validity. But I have had this impression and am curious whether others do too.
@canadianenglish, @dredhead: I should clarify. I define feedees as people who find gaining to be erotic, whether they've actually done it or not. Just as someone can be gay without having practiced gay sex, a feedee can be a feedee without having gained on purpose, a feeder can be a feeder without having encouraged someone to gain. So I would say even a conflicted feedee who has chosen not to gain is still a feedee.
If you disagree, that's fine; but please let's not turn this thread into a discussion of taxonomy! If you want to argue it, please start another thread.
14 years
Dredhed wrote
I'm not realy conflincted about gaining. That's what being a feedee is about.
Ideally, but a lot of people have the urge and are still conflicted. Just check all the "should I gain?" threads in this very forum!
14 years
It seems to me that feedees are less conflicted about gaining these days than in the past.
Anyone else notice this? Or is it just wishful thinking on my part?
14 years
