Munchies:
Honestly? I'm not arguing with your pro-rape self. I've already reported you.
Sure do hope you treated your late wife better than your views on women imply.
Weetabix:
You've effectively reported yourself whilst you were reporting me. Having a crack at me over my late wife is something you'd report me for if I did it to you.
Munchies:
I'm not pro-rape, so I'm not worried.
And that is the end of that.
It may not be the end, you reported this thread so your conduct maybe scrutinised. It's no longer your call.
11 months
Munchies:
This whole thread started with a guy just trying to do research for his very innocent story.
Sadly, we cannot have nice things.
Then you posed this "Is this the same person you took candid photos of without her consent and posted online for strangers to oggle?"
11 months
Munchies:
Honestly? I'm not arguing with your pro-rape self. I've already reported you.
Sure do hope you treated your late wife better than your views on women imply.
You've effectively reported yourself whilst you were reporting me. Having a crack at me over my late wife is something you'd report me for if I did it to you.
11 months
Nofbar:
In general you can record whatever you like and do whatever you like stuff that is seen/heard in public. BUT using what you get for harassment/stalking/titilation is in general not legal
Titillation is in the mind of the beholder. Harassment is an actual activity which affects the victim, as would be stalking if they became aware of it.
11 months
Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.
SumoSized:
My guy, it shouldn't be a hot take that women shouldn't be recorded or photographed and then uploaded to a fetish site without their explicit consent. That's a massive privacy concern and it's honestly terrifying that you don't realize that
Munchies:
Not just that. Seeing that Weetabix is one of those anti-establishment types, he's the last person who should be pro-spying on people. Especially since that means people could legally spy on him and all that entails.
If you can't accept it this law for altruistic reasons, then at least accept it for selfish ones.
If you go out in public wearing something that men could wack off to but you don't want them doing so then the obvious measure is don't do that. Providing men with the material for that then punishing them afterwards is stupid and unfair. It's actually entrapment.
You don't have an expectation of privacy when in public. Where ever you go there are cameras watching and recording. Lots of doorbel cams, street cams, shop cams, traffic cams. If there was a law against it then the cameras would be removed. Generally what a camera sees the eye can see. There are cases where cameras see more than one would expect like x-ray and infrared and zoom lenses etc. One must expect those too.
There was the case where the Tesla camera was recording people inside their garage and that did break privacy laws. Outside it does not.
11 months
Morbidly A Beast:
I hope she sees your post you creepy incel freak racist
Yeah, now I see the point. Some people on here are really quite abusive. However I'd probably be able to defend myself if you said that to my face.
Yeah, get rid of the stupid law, I'll take my chances.
11 months
Munchies:
It's not a stupid law. It protects the people in the pictures, and it even protects you, Weetabix. I'm pretty sure the last thing you want is for people who don't like you to get ahold of your images and post them for all to see and demean.
While I do not wish this harm to befall you, these laws would give you recourse for justice. Horrible people do not discriminate. Anyone can be a victim. Hell, the laws in your country are even stricter than those in my country.
No, it still seems stupid to me. What you show in public is in public. Perhaps tagging the person's contact details to an anonymous image would be a step too far. Sounds very woke and leftie to me.
11 months
Nitchbigger:
I once knew a waitresses who gained 60lbs in 3 months on accident. She was stuffing herself like crazy that holiday season. Lots of food and booz. She had the biggest pregnant looking belly I've ever seen irl by the end of it.
Munchies:
Is this the same person you took candid photos of without her consent and posted online for strangers to oggle?
Because if that's the person I am thinking about, you have got to let her go. This is how you end up with a restraining order.
Weetabix:
Yeah, fat in public people can take photos. Get over it.
Munchies:
Not even what I am getting at.
It's a consent issue. Can't post pics or videos of people and upload them to an adult site for people to goon over without their consent.
That's a crime.
As in go to jail kind of crime.
Weetabix:
I'm not sure it's a crime. Obviously if they were naked pictures but if the person is OK in public then they're not porn.
I expect someone could obtain a court order but until they do it's not against the law.
Munchies:
No, it is, in fact, a crime. In fact, it's multiple crimes at the state and federal level. Even if the picture itself isn't explicit, once you post it to and adult site for people to goon over, it becomes revenge porn
On top of that, the multiple pictures he took (he posted a link to it once ages ago, so I know) constitute stalking and harrassment. To say nothing of the potential privacy and consent laws he broke depending on jurisdiction.
All of this is on top of a civil lawsuit which he would have to pay damages.
There's a reason why Curvage shut down their Candid section and why Pornhub got gutted.
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.
11 months
Nitchbigger:
I once knew a waitresses who gained 60lbs in 3 months on accident. She was stuffing herself like crazy that holiday season. Lots of food and booz. She had the biggest pregnant looking belly I've ever seen irl by the end of it.
Munchies:
Is this the same person you took candid photos of without her consent and posted online for strangers to oggle?
Because if that's the person I am thinking about, you have got to let her go. This is how you end up with a restraining order.
Weetabix:
Yeah, fat in public people can take photos. Get over it.
Munchies:
Not even what I am getting at.
It's a consent issue. Can't post pics or videos of people and upload them to an adult site for people to goon over without their consent.
That's a crime.
As in go to jail kind of crime.
I'm not sure it's a crime. Obviously if they were naked pictures but if the person is OK in public then they're not porn.
I expect someone could obtain a court order but until they do it's not against the law.
11 months
I think a person can gain a pound a day but probably for a month. I think by the 2nd month her metabolism would have changed and the gain will have slowed. I expect more than 30lbs but less than 90lbs.
People who have been massively obese can gain back all their lost weight in 3 months. That's not really what you're looking for though.
11 months
