Forced femme
WannabeBlob:
I was employing hyperbole to paint a word picture, but I’m glad that’s what you got out of it or sorry that happened to you.
Munchies:
You can't be out here saying things like how your fetish makes you a danger to others. If all you wanted was to engage in hyperbole, there were tons of other ways to do so.
I was employing hyperbole to paint a word picture, but I’m glad that’s what you got out of it or sorry that happened to you.
Munchies:
You can't be out here saying things like how your fetish makes you a danger to others. If all you wanted was to engage in hyperbole, there were tons of other ways to do so.
Kinda seems like they (wannabeblo
can. You vomit words and insinuate and condescend and engage in bad faith constantly. Kinda seems like anyone can just say anything on this site whenever they want, if you're any indication. You come into a thread, choose someone who you think has made a mistake, and go knives out.
Because this is all you have.
Your sense of self-righteousness is tedious and as far as I can see from years of observation and a few embarrassing-by-proxy personal interactions we've had, entirely unearned.
Feel free to get the last word, I'm sure you'll be the final post before this site goes under. You're clearly dedicated to both.
3 months
Why are so many discussions getting locked?
X_Larsson:
So more ad hominem being dished out (but not by me, but by the "caring" and "tolerant" people, again?), while the straight forward question from myself and @Letters and Numbers remains un-addressed.
And it would be helpful to see the justification given as a final post if a discussion is shut down.
Can we by the way assume that ad hominem to the level used against me and some others is "free for all" to use without any repercussions? Is that the core and spirit of this board of "open" and "tolerant" people? Today it seems to be the way.
Munchies:
Darling, I believe you and I have very different recollections of how that conversation went. That said, do you really believe this is the wisest way to go about this?
Because while I have no desire to rehash what happened beyond what I've already said, I can't promise the same for others. If you honestly believe that you are the victim of ad hominem attacks (though I don't believe you are), wouldn't calling attention to that previous altercation put a target on your for ad hominem attacks?
There's this thing called the Streisand effect. You should look into it.
So more ad hominem being dished out (but not by me, but by the "caring" and "tolerant" people, again?), while the straight forward question from myself and @Letters and Numbers remains un-addressed.
And it would be helpful to see the justification given as a final post if a discussion is shut down.
Can we by the way assume that ad hominem to the level used against me and some others is "free for all" to use without any repercussions? Is that the core and spirit of this board of "open" and "tolerant" people? Today it seems to be the way.
Munchies:
Darling, I believe you and I have very different recollections of how that conversation went. That said, do you really believe this is the wisest way to go about this?
Because while I have no desire to rehash what happened beyond what I've already said, I can't promise the same for others. If you honestly believe that you are the victim of ad hominem attacks (though I don't believe you are), wouldn't calling attention to that previous altercation put a target on your for ad hominem attacks?
There's this thing called the Streisand effect. You should look into it.
Jfc gaslighting and victim blaming
2 years
