Unintentional wg (cw eating disorder mention)

Chunkyshark:
Saaaame lmao like “oh you’re so soft and flabby even though you’re not huge yet what’s your secret” Haha cyclical anorexia b/p subtype, thanks!

I think I’m finally “recovered” and ready to be fat as fuck though and just blow my skin out so I never get delusions of the possibility of thinness ever again


I've got mild body dysphoria. I find associating a body shape with your happiness or self-worth is a bad idea. Your weight can go up or down. It's good that you're able to eat food and gain weight without feeling bad for doing it. But when your gains don't go the way you want them to go, it's easy to end up in a dark place.

Anyway, I'm rooting for you to wake up and love the person staring back at you in the mirror - no matter how you look at any point.
1 year

Why are so many discussions getting locked?

Morbidly A Beast:
If you look through the threads what happens is pretty obvious, and it’s not hard to figure out what occurs. Someone goes off the goop and says something insensitive they get called on it then rather than owning up to it and saying I messed up they double down and it spirals from there.


I just like to clown people I made a sarcastic mocking statement and a dude took that to go on a little dark age tik tok edit about how the west was falling nonsense. asking people to be decent human beings is to much sometimes


Oh God, I remember that one. It was wild.

Everyone goofs up. Even I've said things unintentionally messed up. To err is human. But what's important is how you respond to criticism.

Do you take the time to listen and learn? Or do you insist you've done nothing wrong ever and quadruple down?

I've seen users get blasted for bad takes before. The ones who didn't mean to be bigoted always apologize and ask how they can be better. When that happens, any drama dies down, and everyone's chill.

It's nice.

But when people quadruple down, it gets really toxic really quickly.
1 year

Why are so many discussions getting locked?


Munchies:
Suddenly things are making more sense.

No shade my guy, but not all of us jive with the whole lay low and play it safe. This is especially true for people like me, whose minority status is visible for all to see. I'm dark-skinned with natural hair. I have to deal with this mess all the time irl and online. I've decided I love myself too much to tolerate people who aren't treating me like a person.

And since I won't tolerate it for myself, I'm not tolerating it for other people.

Malvineous:
Huh, you must have really misunderstood me.

I never compared myself to you, nor assumed we have a similar experience online, nor insinuated that everyone else should feel the same as me about their minority status. I don't agree with any of those statements. I don't think you should tolerate people who don't treat you like a person, in fact I said people who target and harass others deserve the response they get. My point revolved solely around false positives, i.e. people who are actually innocent of what they're being accused of. I think this might be a good illustration actually. I must have miscommunicated somewhere, because it seems like you think I'm making arguments for positions I don't actually agree with. This kind of thing can easily happen in online discussions. Plus I'm exhausted, so that may be contributing.


I'm referring to this statement here:

The only problem I see is in the grey areas where what someone says isn't anywhere near close to that, but some people feel inclined to start dogpiling anyway because they have a personal zero tolerance policy toward anything that smells of bigotry or what they interpret as dog whistles, even if that wasn't actually the person's intent. I've personally seen quite a few cases like that happen too. I think in general it's just a good policy for people to err on the side of civility and take people at their word unless proven otherwise. Even if I strongly suspect someone is arguing in bad faith, I will usually try to give a genuine response anyway.


I think you have a misunderstanding about how bigotry works. A lot of times, people will say bigoted things without realizing what they are saying is bad. Sometimes, they'll say something they think is a compliment or a joke but is actually deeply harmful.

Sometimes, if you are lucky, you can explain why what they said was harmful, and they will apologize and learn from it. But most of the time, they'll minimize or dismiss what you're saying. And if you push the issue, it's common for them to go mask off and say something really bigoted.

Now, I have seen well-meaning people accuse someone of bigotry when they weren't being bigoted. However, that is rare. In the two years I've been on this site, I can count the number of "false positives" on one hand. And, once again, not understanding why something is bigoted isn't a "false positive."
1 year

Why are so many discussions getting locked?

Munchies:
Are you in community with any minority groups? I am genuinely curious.

Malvineous:
I'm Jewish, bi, and diagnosed on the spectrum. Yes, I've been on the receiving end of anti-Semitic and ableist comments before. It's not something I'm vocal about because I don't want it to affect how people perceive me, whether that's for better or worse.


Suddenly things are making more sense.

No shade my guy, but not all of us jive with the whole lay low and play it safe. This is especially true for people like me, whose minority status is visible for all to see. I'm dark-skinned with natural hair. I have to deal with this mess all the time irl and online. I've decided I love myself too much to tolerate people who aren't treating me like a person.

And since I won't tolerate it for myself, I'm not tolerating it for other people.
1 year

Why are so many discussions getting locked?

Letters And Numbers:
I guess to answer the OP’s question in a different way, threads get locked because mods don’t have a lot of other tools at their disposal. They can’t discipline individual users, so locking threads is the only real tool at their disposal. I’m sure admins have more tools to use, but there are fewer admins. Threads can be unlocked.

As an alternative to locking threads, having a way to mute individual users for a period of time might be helpful when one person is harassing or spamming, etc. A stop gap until an admin can review the situation.


I feel like muting a user would be extremely helpful. I've seen a lot of instances where everyone is having a lovely time, and then one person comes in and shits all over the place. Muting could be a useful tool until admin is able to review the situation.

I also think users being able to mute another could be nice. Sometimes, you just don't jive with another user, and not seeing their posts could be nice. When you mute them, you could see they've posted, but not what they posted. Then you could have the option to see a specific post or not. I'm thinking it would work like posts tagged NSFW on social media sites.
1 year

Why are so many discussions getting locked?

Malvineous:
If someone is being overtly hateful and targeting other members, then yeah, that kind of response is totally warranted. Guys like that deserve it. I do recall seeing a case like that in the past where a guy was proudly calling himself a white supremacist, and had to be removed, but in the meantime people were shutting down any conversation that started going in that direction.

The only problem I see is in the grey areas where what someone says isn't anywhere near close to that, but some people feel inclined to start dogpiling anyway because they have a personal zero tolerance policy toward anything that smells of bigotry or what they interpret as dog whistles, even if that wasn't actually the person's intent. I've personally seen quite a few cases like that happen too. I think in general it's just a good policy for people to err on the side of civility and take people at their word unless proven otherwise. Even if I strongly suspect someone is arguing in bad faith, I will usually try to give a genuine response anyway.


Are you in community with any minority groups? I am genuinely curious.
1 year

Food guilt

PurpleJade:
TW: s/h

Anytime I try to gain I never feel as if my motives are driving me, and I’m just using food as an escape or for control.

I started gaining January during a cruise because it was fitting. Since then I’ve put on 10 pounds and tracked my weight obsessively. Once in the morning once at night. It absolutely is a turn on, I’m watching real time as my weight increases and my capacity increases. Unfortunately it also feels like I’m grasping for control.


As someone who has s/h in the past I understand the high feeling I got from it from that control. Whenever I’m gaining it’s so similar that it’s hard not to associate the two.

It doesn't help that my work circumstance would justify the feeling of no control. I’m currently waiting for more hours so I can move to salary, but am not receiving the proper workload from project managers so I’m stuck as a part time contractor with no other companies. I have enough money for rent for the next year and paying off all student loans, my situation is annoying at worst requiring me to find another job.

To clarify, I don’t want to s/h and haven't since I was in high school. I’m receiving therapist attention and have already talked on my work situation. My snag is I don’t want to inform my therapist of my fetish, and ask how to separate the association of s/h at the same time.

Just curious if anyone else has similar feelings and knows techniques to disassociate the two. I’m sure I’m not the only one.


Hey love. I'm sorry you're going through it. I have faith you'll get through to the other side.

I have PTSD and have had depression with s/i in the past. I never self-harmed, but I had maladaptive pleasure-seeking. That's nearly the same thing.

I am also an ex-gainer who has body dysmorphia. I remember hopping on the scale 10 times a day and dealing with the highs and lows with weight fluctuation.

Not a good time for me.

I'm in a better place now, but a large part of it involved reconciling with my fetish. It's a part of who I am and ignoring that does a huge disservice to myself. I understand opening up about something so intimate can be scary. But it's vital to your healing.
1 year

38f feedee iso 25-45m irl sadistic feeder

MakeMe:
So, the feeder I was supposed to meet this weekend up and deleted his account.

I am serious about wanting to have an experience like this. Anyone out there who isn't a flake?

X_Larsson:
Your below two criteria from your profile will definitely remove quite a few men from the list.
Feederism tends to be a long term process, at least for many enthusiasts. And also, quite a few men simply do not want ONS or the women that are interested in that type of relations.

"NOT interested in a relationship.
NOT interested in anything serious or ongoing."


Babes, come on. Stop being cringe. Unless she's being gross, there's no reason to make these kinds of posts. Either she'll find what she wants or she won't. She's not hurting anyone.
1 year

Why are so many discussions getting locked?


Morbidly A Beast:
Nah letting bigots have free rein without consequence when they spew their nonsense is objectively worse than being direct and confrontational every time they spew their garbage. Maybe it’s not the job of people to confront abstract things but it’s definitely on the part of our community to keep hate and bigotry out of our spaces, if you let one they will think that behavior is okay others will join in, and that’s no place I or others want to be in.

Malvineous:
Ok, but you're explicitly violating TOS. What you're saying might be true for disorganized communities, but not here. This isn't society at large, and this isn't a place for internet activism. In this case, tolerance actually DOES mean tolerating the intolerant until you can get a moderator to act on your behalf. It's literally their job to do so. When you confront people, you're actually being counter-productive to what you want, because all you succeeded in doing is getting the thread closed, while they still remain a member and will continue to post. That doesn't actually scare the trolls at all. If I'm wrong in my interpretation of the rules, I'll gladly accept that correction from a moderator.

I'll edit to add an analogy. If you're part of the gaming community, and someone is acting disruptive, then yes, people should do some gatekeeping on their own. But if you're part of an after school club, and someone says something out of pocket, then by rising up and yelling at them, it only makes you look like you're just as disruptive and part of the problem. But if you turn to the club president and tell them that person is turning this into a toxic environment, then thy have an excuse to act and bar that person from future meetings.


Okay, so I'm going to stop you right there.

I am a WOC. While most people on this site are normal human beings, I have experienced discrimination on this platform. I've experienced everything from death threats and slurs to creepy people sexually harrassing me.

I do report it when it happens. And admin has taken action. But that can take time since I have to take screenshots and send an email to people in a very different time zones. So in the meantime, confronting the bigot is important.

I remember about a year ago, we had this extremely unpleasant user who'd be super gross in chat all the time. Complete menace to society. Admin had told him to get his act together more than once, but he didn't care.

One day, he snapped and went on a racist tirade. Started using all the slurs and saying a bunch of really messed up things. He locked on black people and Jewish people specifically. Numerous people reported him, but it takes time to get a response back.

In the mean time, the community rallied together. A few tracked down a mod while everyone else pushed back against his awefullness. There were a handful on black people and Jewish people in chat at the time. So it was really nice to see white people step up and push back against it too.

You do not and should not tolerate bigotry. Yeah, it's nice to be gently corrected if you accidentally say something bigotted. I think everyone has said something bigotted without meaning to be. But that isn't something you're owed. And you especially aren't owed that grace if you say it with your chest.

Also, I don't think it violates TOS to check a bigot. I've done that several times, and when I seen admin forum links or screenshots with full context, I've never been told I was in the wrong. And some of my reports were viewed by the site owner.
1 year

Why are so many discussions getting locked?

Wouldn't it be ironic if this thread gets locked?
1 year