Fantasy Feeder

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Enas:
You failed to actually answer my question. Is what is described in the page i linked, what you meant by saying "logical circularity"?

FatGTP:
Implicitly I already answered your question. Playing dumb won't help you maneuver out of the dead end you're stuck in.

I will take this as a yes just because what you said earlier sounded like it is what i linked.

So, by definition, circular reasoning requires 2 assertions. One must necesarily be a premise and the other, again must necesarily be, the conclusion. But in what i said, for which you accused me of circular reasoning, i only made one assertion, not two. That means it is definetely not circular reasoning. So this accusation falls apart.

In fact, just because it was a single assertion and not an argument to begin with, it cannot constitute any kind of logical fallacy. Assertions by themselves cannot be fallacious. All they can be is true, or false.

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Enas:
By "logical circularity" you mean this?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

FatGTP:
The pernicious part is that you yourself are trapped in it. Even if Wikipedia explains the mechanism to you in detail, you'll struggle to recognize what it describes within your flawed thesis. That, too, is inherent to the situation.

You failed to actually answer my question. Is what is described in the page i linked, what you meant by saying "logical circularity"?

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Enas:
I dont need to understand you in order to understand if and how my logic is faulty.

FatGTP:
That's called a logical circularity, and that exactly illustrates where your problem lies, thanks.

By "logical circularity" you mean this?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

Enas:
That implies you've ignored what people other than Munchies, have said in this thread.

Plus, Munchies has already told you she is a sadist who will troll back the trolls. You don’t need to assume her motivations, she already asserted that, and her behavior aligns with it.

At this point, for me, this is litteraly just an exercise to point out the logical fallacies and inconsistencies you make.

FatGTP:
That more suggests there's something wrong with your 'logic'.

Enas:
Elaborate please, im all ears!

FatGTP:
I would actually explain it to you if there were any chance that you truly wanted to understand me. But by now that seems out of the question.

Red herring again. I dont need to understand you in order to understand if and how my logic is faulty.

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

Enas:
That implies you've ignored what people other than Munchies, have said in this thread.

Plus, Munchies has already told you she is a sadist who will troll back the trolls. You don’t need to assume her motivations, she already asserted that, and her behavior aligns with it.

At this point, for me, this is litteraly just an exercise to point out the logical fallacies and inconsistencies you make.

FatGTP:
That more suggests there's something wrong with your 'logic'.

Elaborate please, im all ears!

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

Munchies:
You are a troll. There's nothing to understand.

Some people choose not to feed the trolls. Some choose to point them and make them dance.

FatGTP:
Your craving for attention is your motivation, not any moral considerations. You simply enjoy playing the superior one and don’t even notice how much you yourself are becoming what you hate. Outsiders rarely bother to analyze threads completely. They only see two people squabbling. You probably haven't noticed that yet.

That implies you've ignored what people other than Munchies, have said in this thread.

Plus, Munchies has already told you she is a sadist who will troll back the trolls. You don’t need to assume her motivations, she already asserted that, and her behavior aligns with it.

At this point, for me, this is litteraly just an exercise to point out the logical fallacies and inconsistencies you make.

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

FatGTP:
You all need to finally agree on what I am and which one of you is correct in your assumption. Both can't be true at the same time.

Morbidly A Beast:
I believe you are a AI or at the very least used AI for a large portion of your writing in this thread. What have it away was the use of erm dashes people don’t use those often

I think the hallucinatory responses ( such as "AI is material" ) are a much stronger clue.

People can use whatever dash is on their keyboard. But no human being is stupid enough to assert than AI, a software, is material. Only AI is non-sensical enough to do that.

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

FatGTP:
You all need to finally agree on what I am and which one of you is correct in your assumption. Both can't be true at the same time.

We dont, as a matter of fact.

We would need to agree on what you are, if we needed to reach consensus for some kind of decision of what to do with you. But since we aren't doing that, we dont need to agree.

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

FatGTP:
The next step would then be to recognize your own hallucination. 😉

That implies im hallucinating, which is false.

Meanwhile, one of your responses litteraly wrote "AI is material". AI, a fucking software.

Edit: By the way this is an example of the red herring fallacy. You attempt to divert attention away from the shortcommings of AI by throwing ad-hominems that are not related to the actual point, in this case that AI hallucinates.

9 months

Enas

Ai generated content, yay or nay?

FatGTP:
And there it was again — the lack of understanding of technology. Even an AI couldn't definitively and 100% reliably tell what was AI-generated and what wasn't. It would be especially difficult when a person, amusingly, mixes the two.

There is a very specific type of hallucinations that an LLM makes in its responses.

I can recognize those.

9 months

Enas