Why do people hit me up, start chatting and then ghost me right away?

HRHB15:
I think, particularly in these fetishes, people kind of come and go. People are kind of fickle with it. Some people get into it and become scared when the numbers get larger. Others decide they don’t want to commit to being a feeder. Some people aren’t sincere in the first place. People are just all over the place.

I know it’s disheartening, but I wouldn’t take it personally.


I find it helps to keep your expectations low. Talk to people with the expectation of just shooting the breeze. If more happens, then yay. If not, oh well. Just keep it trucking.
1 year

Why do people hit me up, start chatting and then ghost me right away?

Curiousv:
Sadly this is becoming more and more common in real life too. Yes, it can happen that someone loses interest after a few dates. Or that things change. But it should be common courtesy to at least tell the other that sorry, things are not working out, and say goodbye. If they don't even want to spend half a minute sending such a message, it just shows how self-centered they are and how little respect they have for others.


So true, bestie
1 year

Why do people hit me up, start chatting and then ghost me right away?

Femmepiggy:
Have on probably 3 occasions now had someone reach out to me enthusiastically, get my other socials, chat with me a bunch etc… I start to feel like I’m building a real connection and then i get ghosted. Not just regular ghosted, full acct deletion ghosted.

Wtf is wrong with people?

If you like my profile and are interested that’s great!
But don’t start hitting me up, asking me for other socials, asking me about myself to get to know me, unless ur gonna hang around at least a little.

Idk, just tired of people doing this. Especially since THEY ARE THE ONES MESSAGING ME TO BEGIN WITH!

Makes me so mad. If you’re gonna hmu just to delete your acct the next day, do us both a favour and *** / don’t talk to me.

Childish behaviour from grown adults twice my age, insane lmao.


Usually means they are cheating and got caught/nearly got caught. Other times things got a little too real (not necessarily with you) and they panic deleted.

Are the accounts fairly new?
1 year

Dating women without physical attraction?

Munchies:
Not even what was said. I said to use the word some instead of "most" or "typically" when talking about characteristics that are not indicative of the group. And no one said you couldn't express yourself. You were told the way you were doing it was hurtful and not expressing yourself as clearly as you'd like.

This is not the same thing.

Malvineous:
Yes, I do use the word "some" to mean a minority or undetermined number of examples that is not indicative of the group. The problem is, that's not the idea I want to express. That's a different idea. Perhaps it would soften the blow to add more waffle words like "I've noticed that it's common for" or "It seems like there's a frequent trend of"...
I promise you I'm not trying to be hurtful. I'm more than willing to change the phrasing I use, so long as it can still mean what I want it to mean.


But that's just it. These trends you're noticing are part of a specific flavor of women and are not inherent to womanhood.

In my town alone, there are women who are attracted to a man based on how good of a provider he is. Some want a man who looks good on their arm or is a good lay. Others want a fricked up little man to be their personal project. And then there are the women who look past all of that and are only attracted to personality.

That doesn't even take into consideration the different cultures, ethnicities, religions, political ideologies, lifestyles, etc that influence or inform attraction.

Honestly, the biggest factors of attraction in a woman is how they were raised and their current values.

So, no. "Most" and "typically" are not the best words to use.
1 year

Dating women without physical attraction?

Malvineous:
Ok, here are two articles that each cite multiple studies on what women find attractive in men.
businessinsider.com/science-backed-qualities-in-men-women-like-2016-6
confidencetoachieve.com.au/what-women-want-in-a-man-according-to-science/

I haven't been explaining to women how women work. I've been giving my thoughts on gendered differences in socialization/psychology, for both men and women who are reading the thread. It's not a private conversation. I know that women fully understand how they work. However, I don't think either gender fully understands how the other works, because each person is limited to their own perspective. Having conversations like this could be a way to reach some kind of understanding about each other.

I didn't expect everyone to agree with me, but I hoped to discuss the ideas on their own merits instead of simply getting told my language is wrong. I asked in good faith how to express the SAME ideas about patterns better, instead I'm basically told not to express them in the first place. Those are the connotations of what you're telling me. Again, I'm not attached to being right about this, but I do care about being able to speak on the topic. It's true that it may not be as widespread as I think, but that's an opportunity to give me some examples that you think are more widespread, and we can discuss.

The example you gave me of 'most men beat their wives' would only bother me because it's untrue. However, if you were to phrase it the other way around, and say that 'most partner abuse is committed by men', then that wouldn't bother me because it is true. My ego isn't wrapped up in such things. (Unless it were used as justification to reach some wild conclusion like 'that's why you should never trust your boyfriend' ). Also, how is saying 'most women are attracted to multiple things in a partner beyond the physical' as bad as saying 'most men beat their wives'? If we look at the connotations, then what I said would paint women in a more flattering light than men, because it would imply they're less "shallow".


Not even what was said. I said to use the word some instead of "most" or "typically" when talking about characteristics that are not indicative of the group. And no one said you couldn't express yourself. You were told the way you were doing it was hurtful and not expressing yourself as clearly as you'd like.


This is not the same thing.
1 year

How out of shape i am

Fiftyseven:
If your wife is open to it need to show us pictures man, you keep telling us about it but at least post a drawing to give us a reference.


Checked out his stuff. He says she doesn't want pictures of herself posted, but I did find two of her that are supposedly somewhat recent with the past few years.

fantasyfeeder.com/pics/photo

fantasyfeeder.com/pics/photo

If this woman is his wife, she doesn't look all that large. Fat, yes. But not to the degree he paints her.
1 year

Dating women without physical attraction?

Munchies:
Here we have OP compare his plight to that of gay people and continue to ignore multiple women calling him out of his misogyny. He demands explanations that have already been given or rejects them outright because he doesn't like them and accuses people of ad hominem attacks were there were none.

You hate to see it.

X_Larsson:
You have not mentioned ONE factual quote where I slander, denigrate, hate, ridicule, diminish etc. Do that, please show where I have done so.

I don't CARE at all if you or anyone on the forum likes me or not, but I have not expressed any of the above things about anyone. I do care about truth, though.
Your feelings are not evidence.

If my posts are full of discrimination and lies, it would be super easy for you to find examples. Noone of you have presented such quotes yet.


*Sips tea*

We did. More than once. Scroll back through the posts. We even quote responded to you so you know we aren't making things up.
1 year