Man, if I had a lady who'd do that, I have no doubt I would blow up until I'm so huge, and I'd love every minute of it!

Only thing that could possibly make it even better if it's her own cooking and baking.

Absolutely and without a doubt. Not that big yet as of this writing, but this takes time. Let's see...

The mass and extra size feels nice, and as I continue to gain weight I expect more built-in softness. I don't feel as fragile as perhaps I once did.

I actually enjoy food now, and not just because the more calories, fat, sugar, carbs, and protein food has, the better it tastes though this helps. I only get disappointed when I get full sooner than I'd like, but as I gain more I expect to be able to eat more. It's a daily joy I didn't have before.

It seems like I get more respect in general, and I have better confidence. At least in the US, there's virtually no social upside whatsoever for a man to be rail skinny.

I get more attention from women than I did before, especially women who are overweight and obese. At least in any area I've lived in, it's pretty rare for me to see a couple with a fat woman but the man isn't. He's nearly always large too. There's definitely a distinct preference. I'm not just gaining to get more attention from fat women, but it definitely helps.

I thus expect it'll be easier to date fat women, the heavier I get.


There's downsides, but most of them don't matter.

Sure, there's some tasks that are a lot harder now, but it's not like I ever really cared about them much in the first place. Jogging several miles? Never got into that. It's also not a bicycle friendly area but I'm not big on that either.

Of the very, very few jobs (virtually none) that have a legitimate, bonafide weight requirement, it's not likely I'd ever do any of them. Even some ladders can support a lot of weight. I've heard cell phone tower technicians used to have a maximum weight of 250 lbs because of safety equipment limits, but presumably that's been increased by now.

At a certain point there might expect severe health or mobility problems, but I don't expect to get that big, and a lot of it is due to genetics too I think. I also don't expect to ever get quite that big, though that point is likely 400+ lbs at average height. I will never get to a point where I can't function independently, assuming access to the various tools and apparatus typical in any developed country.

Some might start saying I'm gross or whatever, but odds are they're gross, fat-phobic types that I wouldn't like anyway, so I'm not losing anything. Or she might be obsessed with aerobic fitness and hate hedonism.

If I somehow do come across a thinner woman I find appealing, I expect she'd be open to a fat man anyway. Perhaps curiously enough, most size contrast couples I've seen are where the man is much larger.

And I guess another downside, is that I have a tendency to think about food more often, and those food ads are much more tempting than they used to be. But that's actually not really a downside at all.

For the calorie density, you'd think you'd hear more about the various other nut butters (besides just peanut butter which is the most common) than you do.

Nutella is also a classic. Some folks will just scoop that up like yogurt, with a spoon. A small jar will contain around 2,000 calories too.

Coconut oil is also very calorie dense as is olive oil and other cooking oils, but of course are not to be consumed straight, instead used for cooking.

Ribeye steak also seems to be quite calorie dense even relative to various other cuts of beef, but the cost per pound is high. I've never actually had it before, due to it's very high relative cost.

Your profile does mention Bellevue, Washington so that's why I had to ask. May want to update that to Rockford, or even Chicago since it's sort of nearby. Might get more relevant interest that way. Just a thought.

From Illinois meaning you were born and raised there, yet you no longer live there, right?

You haven't found the cream to be very filling and negatively impacting your appetite? That's something I've noticed if I have a lot of cream at once.

Really makes me wonder if that someone actually tried it.

Once I tried mixing in maltodextrin powder.. whether it's pure maltodextrin or is mostly it (like a lot of weight gain powders are), it seems to clump up SO bad when mixed with dairy fat. Forget about ever being able to drink it. I had to throw out the mix.

So unless there's some trick to it that I don't know, I can't imagine that working out very well.

Are you going to tell us what the game is, and how to play?

Any of the major chains should have funnels, PVC tubing, hose clamps, and valves. But it might be tricky to find a funnel with a tight fit for the tube. But like I said, given the cost you're likely better off just getting a premade beer bong.

I've never heard of a hardware store selling those put together. If you really don't want to use Amazon, there's other online sellers. If it must be in person, your best shot may be Spencer's (if you still have one) or a liquor store near a university (if you have one). Most liquor stores in general don't sell these.

As for what I said earlier about wireframe hangers, scratch that. A better idea would be punching 4 holes near the top edge of the funnel, in an X pattern (imagine if you were to cut a pizza into 4 slices). Then use string, twine, or fishing line to go through the holes. At the center of the X shape the string will make, should be able to support that with an S hook (that could fit on a clothing rack), or if it's possible, a ceiling hook. Although that elaborate support mechanism is most useful for self funneling. Another nice thing about the portable clothing rack, is that being portable, means it can be used in front of the computer, in the living room while sitting on the couch, and/or wherever else you want.

Whatever you do though, don't use the shower curtain bar in the bathroom unless certain. Those are usually flimsy and weak, and likely won't support the weight of this contraption, or the contents when filled.

A write-in would be difficult to search for, so that may not be the best idea? One might type in, for example "female to male" while another user could type "M2F," which is a lack of consistency. That's the only major problem I could think of with write in.

It would also be likely to difficult to code. I know some things about programming. To be entirely fair, I have not looked at similar code of the CMS used here, and even if I did, it's likely been modified heavily.

But, it's likely a trait where it's been coded for one selection in mind. "No gender" is likely NULL or 0, "female" would be 1, "male" could be 2, "transgender" could be 3, and so on.

Depending on how the data is stored, it may also be more difficult to transition this data field from one that expects a single selection to one that accepts multiple. This would also bring up the issue of converting the legacy data for the new format. While not impossible, even if accepted it would take more time to implement.

Given these constraints, one possible nearer term solution that would be likely to be far easier to code for, or in other words would mean it'd be more likely to implemented more quickly, would be to add a few more hardcoded options. For example, "trans M2F" which could be 5, and "trans F2M" which could be 6, and so on.

Another, potentially easier option might be to leave the current options as they are, but add an additional data field which could perhaps be a checkbox (select multiple if you want) or even write in. Perhaps this could include checkbox options such as "AFAB" or "AMAB."

Anyway, just wanted to come up with some possible solutions, including some potentially easier nearer term solutions which could mean faster implementation.