just bringing this back up for people who haven't seen it before
6 years
Fat Ballerina:
Please behave yourselves and be civil, being anti-sjw won't ingratiate yourself to the cis-gendered, second, OP begged the question to begin with. Keep it civil or I'll close the thread.
Hey Its May:
Abuse does not necessarily mean it's a consent issue. I don't know what your first sentence implies, but sjw behavior is not tolerated in 2018. Close whatever thread you want, more people agree with Me. Plus I was the one saying we should go back on topic. Nice try. I noticed you never have anything to say or any action to take when you encounter bots, spam, website problems... But when someone is fed up with sjw's going off topic and tries to bring the conversation back, then you step in. Ask yourself why that is. Maybe it has to do with the fact that you live in a little liberal bubble when in reality the world rebelled against sjw behavior in 2016. And finally, you don't even show your face on here, what are you embarrassed? Now, let the topic go back to how it was please.
hey guys no need for this back and forth.
@
Fat Ballerina:: I may have worded my question badly, but consent was always implied in my mind (after all this question was for feedees). My point was to discuss how far can we push this feederism thing in a context of consensual BDSM play that is not all about stuffing and forcefeeding etc...
@
Hey Its May:: thanks a lot for your enthusiastic defense of the subject, but it's okay for people to voice their concerns, we are all here on the same side trying to figure out this thing that brings us together
6 years
Hey Its May:
More SJWs making something into a consent issue when the OP never made any statement about there being no consent. Just embarrassing. Let's get this back on topic please, no more virtue signaling would be nice.
Musefan34:
Yeah sure let's ignore that they asked whether it's abuse or not and someone answered that it's fine with consent
In my defense (OP here) I thought consent was implied here, my question was about how far is too far to push this feederism thing, and maybe shed a light/discuss this specific fantasy for a bit. That's why my question was for feedees since they are the one's who need to give consent.
6 years
How would you feel if your feeder started using sex as positive/negative reinforcement for your gaining, as in, stopping having sex until you reach a certain weight
Is it hot or is it just emotional abuse?
6 years
StarSmoke:
I�d prefer a feeder quiz! Encouragement isn�t much fun for me without being fed along with it! 😊
encourager is a blanket term for all kind of feeders
7 years
mine is:
The encourager:
You’re the typical encourager, you love your man fat and you help him get bigger, you love to witness the changes and do whatever to encourage him to be fatter, either by manually feeding him, helping him order when you’re out, or just by telling him how fat and fabulous he looks. Pros: you like to have a balanced relationship where both parties are on the same page. Cons: sometimes it’s hard to separate what’s sexual and what’s not when you’re part of this scene
7 years
find what kind of encouragers are you or best suits you with this quiz
share results!
uquiz.com/Z5tuCN
7 years
I was the kid that stared at fat men in public spaces and made them uncomfortable, but then I hit that fun age of 6 - 7 and I was told that it wasn't polite to stare
7 years
