Younggainer77:
Started drinking cyproheptadine syrup and gained 3 pounds in just 2 days on an empty stomach. This syrup is really working.

Have anybody tried this thing? What can I expect in a month?🐷

Munchies:
Honestly? I'm not arguing with your pro-rape self. I've already reported you.

Sure do hope you treated your late wife better than your views on women imply.

Weetabix:
You've effectively reported yourself whilst you were reporting me. Having a crack at me over my late wife is something you'd report me for if I did it to you.

Munchies:
I'm not pro-rape, so I'm not worried.

And that is the end of that.

Weetabix:
It may not be the end, you reported this thread so your conduct maybe scrutinised. It's no longer your call.

Munchies:
Honestly? I'm not arguing with your pro-rape self. I've already reported you.

Sure do hope you treated your late wife better than your views on women imply.

Weetabix:
You've effectively reported yourself whilst you were reporting me. Having a crack at me over my late wife is something you'd report me for if I did it to you.

Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.

SumoSized:
My guy, it shouldn't be a hot take that women shouldn't be recorded or photographed and then uploaded to a fetish site without their explicit consent. That's a massive privacy concern and it's honestly terrifying that you don't realize that

Munchies:
Not just that. Seeing that Weetabix is one of those anti-establishment types, he's the last person who should be pro-spying on people. Especially since that means people could legally spy on him and all that entails.

If you can't accept it this law for altruistic reasons, then at least accept it for selfish ones.

Weetabix:
If you go out in public wearing something that men could wack off to but you don't want them doing so then the obvious measure is don't do that. Providing men with the material for that then punishing them afterwards is stupid and unfair. It's actually entrapment.

You don't have an expectation of privacy when in public. Where ever you go there are cameras watching and recording. Lots of doorbel cams, street cams, shop cams, traffic cams. If there was a law against it then the cameras would be removed. Generally what a camera sees the eye can see. There are cases where cameras see more than one would expect like x-ray and infrared and zoom lenses etc. One must expect those too.

There was the case where the Tesla camera was recording people inside their garage and that did break privacy laws. Outside it does not.

Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.

SumoSized:
My guy, it shouldn't be a hot take that women shouldn't be recorded or photographed and then uploaded to a fetish site without their explicit consent. That's a massive privacy concern and it's honestly terrifying that you don't realize that

Nitchbigger:
I once knew a waitresses who gained 60lbs in 3 months on accident. She was stuffing herself like crazy that holiday season. Lots of food and booz. She had the biggest pregnant looking belly I've ever seen irl by the end of it.

Munchies:
Is this the same person you took candid photos of without her consent and posted online for strangers to oggle?

Because if that's the person I am thinking about, you have got to let her go. This is how you end up with a restraining order.

Weetabix:
Yeah, fat in public people can take photos. Get over it.

Munchies:
Not even what I am getting at.

It's a consent issue. Can't post pics or videos of people and upload them to an adult site for people to goon over without their consent.

That's a crime.

As in go to jail kind of crime.

Weetabix:
I'm not sure it's a crime. Obviously if they were naked pictures but if the person is OK in public then they're not porn.

I expect someone could obtain a court order but until they do it's not against the law.

Munchies:
No, it is, in fact, a crime. In fact, it's multiple crimes at the state and federal level. Even if the picture itself isn't explicit, once you post it to and adult site for people to goon over, it becomes revenge porn

On top of that, the multiple pictures he took (he posted a link to it once ages ago, so I know) constitute stalking and harrassment. To say nothing of the potential privacy and consent laws he broke depending on jurisdiction.

All of this is on top of a civil lawsuit which he would have to pay damages.

There's a reason why Curvage shut down their Candid section and why Pornhub got gutted.

Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.

Nitchbigger:
I once knew a waitresses who gained 60lbs in 3 months on accident. She was stuffing herself like crazy that holiday season. Lots of food and booz. She had the biggest pregnant looking belly I've ever seen irl by the end of it.

Munchies:
Is this the same person you took candid photos of without her consent and posted online for strangers to oggle?

Because if that's the person I am thinking about, you have got to let her go. This is how you end up with a restraining order.

Weetabix:
Yeah, fat in public people can take photos. Get over it.

Munchies:
Not even what I am getting at.

It's a consent issue. Can't post pics or videos of people and upload them to an adult site for people to goon over without their consent.

That's a crime.

As in go to jail kind of crime.

Weetabix:
I'm not sure it's a crime. Obviously if they were naked pictures but if the person is OK in public then they're not porn.

I expect someone could obtain a court order but until they do it's not against the law.

Munchies:
No, it is, in fact, a crime. In fact, it's multiple crimes at the state and federal level. Even if the picture itself isn't explicit, once you post it to and adult site for people to goon over, it becomes revenge porn

On top of that, the multiple pictures he took (he posted a link to it once ages ago, so I know) constitute stalking and harrassment. To say nothing of the potential privacy and consent laws he broke depending on jurisdiction.

All of this is on top of a civil lawsuit which he would have to pay damages.

There's a reason why Curvage shut down their Candid section and why Pornhub got gutted.

SteelCityFA08:
A lot of places more than likely have a wire tap law as well. Like in Pennsylvania, you can't video/audio record or take pictures without the other persons consent. Definitely a crime

Nitchbigger:
I once knew a waitresses who gained 60lbs in 3 months on accident. She was stuffing herself like crazy that holiday season. Lots of food and booz. She had the biggest pregnant looking belly I've ever seen irl by the end of it.

Munchies:
Is this the same person you took candid photos of without her consent and posted online for strangers to oggle?

Because if that's the person I am thinking about, you have got to let her go. This is how you end up with a restraining order.

Weetabix:
Yeah, fat in public people can take photos. Get over it.

Munchies:
Not even what I am getting at.

It's a consent issue. Can't post pics or videos of people and upload them to an adult site for people to goon over without their consent.

That's a crime.

As in go to jail kind of crime.

Weetabix:
I'm not sure it's a crime. Obviously if they were naked pictures but if the person is OK in public then they're not porn.

I expect someone could obtain a court order but until they do it's not against the law.

Nitchbigger:
I once knew a waitresses who gained 60lbs in 3 months on accident. She was stuffing herself like crazy that holiday season. Lots of food and booz. She had the biggest pregnant looking belly I've ever seen irl by the end of it.

Munchies:
Is this the same person you took candid photos of without her consent and posted online for strangers to oggle?

Because if that's the person I am thinking about, you have got to let her go. This is how you end up with a restraining order.

Weetabix:
Yeah, fat in public people can take photos. Get over it.