That's pretty much the long and the short of it. If you put yourself out there and treat people the way you want to be treated, it's not hard to find people you want to befriend. Might take some patience, but you can find your people.

Bless your heart, my dear.

It seems I was not clear enough for you in my previous post. Let me try again.

The first study is about the impact macro and micronutrient have on visceral fat. The second focus on the impact with nutrition, insulin levels, and visceral fat. While they have similar focus, they have different scopes and methodology.

Keep in mind the first study focuses on health Japanese adults while the second focuses on overweight Latino boys. As such, the results are going to be a bit different.

In fact, the first study has this to say:

3.4. Macronutrients Associated with Change in VFA or BMI
The associations between changes in macronutrients and VFA or BMI are shown in Table 4. For VFA, in Model 1, the following factors were used for the adjustment: age, sex, VFA, and amount of each macronutrient (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) ingested at baseline, and the change in intake of energy, amount of exercise, BMI, WC, and smoking habit. Of the 33 micronutrients, changes in two nutrients, soluble dietary fiber and manganese, were significantly negatively associated with change in VFA (β = −2.31, p = 0.014 and β = −2.43, p = 0.018) over 2 years. In Model 2, the following factors were used for the adjustment: age, sex, VFA, and amount of each macronutrient (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) ingested at baseline, and the change in the amount of protein, fat, and carbohydrate ingested; amount of exercise; BMI; WC; and smoking habit. Of the 33 micronutrients, change in 7 micronutrients, soluble dietary fiber, manganese, potassium, magnesium, vitamin K, folic acid, and pantothenic acid, were significantly negatively associated with change in VFA (β = −2.59, p = 0.007, β = −2.19, p = 0.042, β = −0.004, p = 0.039, β = −0.06, p = 0.018, β = −0.011, p = 0.050, β = −0.018, p = 0.045 and β = −3.43, p = 0.001), and change in 1 micronutrient, monounsaturated fat, was significantly positively associated with change in VFA (β = 1.34, p = 0.050). However, vitamin K and monounsaturated fat had borderline p-values (p = 0.05). For BMI, in Model 3, the following factors were used for the adjustment: age, sex, BMI, and amount of each macronutrient (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) ingested at baseline, and change in the energy ingested, amount of exercise, VFA, WC, and smoking habit. Of the 33 micronutrients, none were significantly associated with a change in BMI. In Model 4, however, the following factors were used for the adjustment: age, sex, BMI, and amount of each macronutrient (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) ingested at baseline, and change in the amount of protein, fat, and carbohydrate ingested; amount of exercise; VFA; WC; smoking habit; and amount of energy ingested. Of the 33 micronutrients, changes in 4 nutrients: alpha-tocopherol, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, and n-3 polyunsaturated fat, were significantly negatively associated with change in VFA (β = −0.061, p = 0.023, β = −0.474, p = 0.015, β = −0.020, p = 0.015, and β = −0.115, p = 0.031). Taken together, 7 micronutrients: soluble dietary fiber, manganese, potassium, magnesium, vitamin K, folic acid, pantothenic acid, alpha-tocopherol, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, and n-3 polyunsaturated fat, which are abundant nutrients in a vegetable diet, had a significant inverse correlation to VFA. Only monounsaturated fat had a significant positive association with VFA.

This is in direct contradiction to your previous statement. This is not to say that one is more correct than the other. Rather they set up their studies very differently and got different results. As I said before, fiber slows down your digestion which minimized insulin spikes. This can lead to decreased visceral body fat.

And this is why you gotta cool it with the desperation and the horny. No one worth spending time will want anything to do with you because they will feel like a used cum rag. And the ones that will give you the time of day will use and abuse you.

Be active on the site, be pleasant to talk to, and put human connection before kink and horny. It's not difficult. And this is coming from an autistic person.

Babes, I've been in the game longer than you. I'm gracing you with free wisdom.

A fool and his money are soon departed. And desperation ain't cute. You wanna scare of the maidens? Because this is how you scare off the maidens. If you don't wise up, the only feedees that will give you the time of day are the ones that want your money.

Did you report them?

Honestly, the number of people eager to give money to strangers is wild to me. I'm not against paying for feedees. I buy mine things all the time. However, it's smarter to wait until you can trust them.

That's internet 101, love. A lot of times, these so-called money hungry feedees are catfish. I've seen men pretend to be women to scam guys out of their money as well as scammer networks consisting of numerous people.

Also, from one sadistic domme to another, you should focus on building a reporte with your feedee of choice. Things are better when there's mutual trust.

Ehhh

I mean, not necessarily. Gyno is a better indicator of high estrogen levels than having a big fat ass. Not saying that it isn't an indicator. Some things are just genetics.

I mean, look at trans women on HRT. Their bodies come in all shapes and sizes.

Yeah. A lot of the male feeders are deplorable, so some women have sworn them off completely

Sounds like a skill issue, love. Sure, there are feedees that want money, but there are also plenty that don't. And yes, I've done online feedings with women too.

A lot of them prefer female feeders - even if they are straight - because we are more likely to engage in platonic kink. Platonic kink is great because there's no pressure. You tell them they should totally have some more pie and maybe do some friendly teasing when they outgrow their clothes. But you also talk about non-kink too.

It's nice.

I read both of these articles. I think there's some confusion about what they mean.

The first is about how a high nutrition diet helps decrease viceral fat over time. The other is a study of Latino boys and a high sugar diet versus one with whole grains and less sugar. In other words, it's not about the fiber itself, but rather eating foods with high nutritional content and a low glycemic index.

That said, fiber is useful for managing your viceral fat levels. Fiber slows down your digestive system so your body isn't overwhelmed with glucose causing an insulin spike. If you've had weight loss surgery, your doctor may recommend taking fiber supplements to minimize or prevent dumping syndrome.