Stealing photos

Netherwulff wrote:
In the case of the update to Fantasy Feeder 2, I think something that is important to implement is a stronger method of blocking images or videos from view by assigning permissions. However, this shouldn't be something users have to pay for at all, which is the issue I take with it right now personally (coming from myself, someone who doesn't have an issue paying for the Combined package himself while also on hiatus for possibly the next month).

Hiccupx mentioned in an earlier thread that the Friends List was being reworked to have several different categories. My thoughts on this are that you could possibly allow uploaders to assign categories of people who 'can' view the photos from those who can't.

I remember one of those categories were "fan/star".

My thoughts on that implementation are that "fans" could register that they want to be one for a user upon viewing a user's pic album, profile, or videos for the first time by the click of a button (think of like how the Subscribe button on YouTube works, only that they would require a confirmation to become a fan). If something like that were integrated, it could allow for a realm of possibilities for the filtering process from there.

Then, uploaders could further manage whether or not they want a thumbnail of the photo show or not when they do decide to permission away these photos, in which case upon clicking the pic or video and not having access to it would show the normal "friends only can view this" error.

Now, if something like this is indeed possible...it would make a huge difference in the best way for this site and helping members here feel that they do have a safe haven from the judgment of others outside of Fantasy Feeder or illegal use of their photos/videos.


It's always a great shame to see members leave when this happens, due to the thoughtless actions of others, and I can totally understand why users become upset when their pictures are stolen.

It comes down to a similar trade-off as the security vs. terrorism argument, do we sacrifice openness and availability for greater protection of content? My own view is that if we go down this route it would be the death of this website. People come here partly because there is always regular updates of pics, videos and other content, imagine how hostile the site would feel if you were barred from most of it because you hadn't yet been accepted as a friend. The Internet as a whole has always preferred openness, although there are repeated attempts to restrict and censor it, and companies like Google are continually fighting to resist this. I believe we should follow in this tradition, although we have to recognize that there are some costs to this.

Ultimately it is impossible to prevent people stealing pictures because in order to view a pic it has to be downloaded to your device, so as soon as you've viewed it you already have a copy. That's just the way the Internet works. Any actions we take to prevent pics being stolen will only ever make it slightly more difficult.

Thankfully losing members over stolen pics is fairly rare and hopefully she will be back. I don't think we should rush into a knee-jerk reaction over this. Just remember, only upload pics that you don't mind being on the Internet.
11 years

Earn money from your stories

Thanks for your offers. I'm currently in the final stages of publishing the first volume, and will have to see how much interest there is before contemplating doing another. Should it happen though I'll look you up smiley
11 years

Curvage.org

georgejorge wrote:
none of those sound conspiracy theory enough. My guess is FF started playing dirty and moping up the competition. smiley


No, it's not some evil plot by FF lol smiley

As mentioned above, they have advertised here and FF and Curvage have always got on very well. We've almost been like complimentary websites, with a lot of members flitting between the two.

James the Curvage webmaster has been very active lately with his sites, so I think it will be back up pretty soon. Maybe he doesn't work weekends, but will bring the site back up tomorrow.
11 years

Buffalo, new york?

Moved to personal ads forum.
11 years

Silly question about forum

As you may have guessed, the -1 isn't by design. Still, adds to the quirkiness of the site I guess.
11 years

Ff2 friends/relationships

oceanmachine wrote:
Make sure that people can add relationships with other people by request only, or you end up with some crackjob who goes around adding relationships without clearing it with the other person first


Don't worry, it will only be by mutual consent, and either person will be able to break it off at any time.
11 years

Ff2 friends/relationships

Hmmm, any other more serious suggestions?
11 years

Any hoosiers out there?

Moved to personal ads.
11 years

Ff2 friends/relationships

Yes both parties would have to agree ( same as it is at the moment), but it would allow more options.

Therefore, a feedee could have feeders, gainers could have encouragers, a 'star' could have 'fans' etc.

Or you may simply want to show that someone is your partner or lover and not just a friend.
11 years

Ff2 friends/relationships

The new version of this website (Fantasy Feeder 2) is progressing in leaps and bounds smiley

In it I'd like to expand the current friends feature to have more options, for instance lovers or partners etc. Here's a list of my current ideas:

* friends
* lovers
* partners
* feeder/feedee
* gainer/encourager
* admirer/beauty
* fan/star

So, which types of relationships would you like to be available (tip: you should be able to apply them equally to men or women, so not gender specific like admirer/BBW)?
11 years