Weetabix:
Lets hope this stupid law is reversed.
SumoSized:
My guy, it shouldn't be a hot take that women shouldn't be recorded or photographed and then uploaded to a fetish site without their explicit consent. That's a massive privacy concern and it's honestly terrifying that you don't realize that
Munchies:
Not just that. Seeing that Weetabix is one of those anti-establishment types, he's the last person who should be pro-spying on people. Especially since that means people could legally spy on him and all that entails.
If you can't accept it this law for altruistic reasons, then at least accept it for selfish ones.
If you go out in public wearing something that men could wack off to but you don't want them doing so then the obvious measure is don't do that. Providing men with the material for that then punishing them afterwards is stupid and unfair. It's actually entrapment.
You don't have an expectation of privacy when in public. Where ever you go there are cameras watching and recording. Lots of doorbel cams, street cams, shop cams, traffic cams. If there was a law against it then the cameras would be removed. Generally what a camera sees the eye can see. There are cases where cameras see more than one would expect like x-ray and infrared and zoom lenses etc. One must expect those too.
There was the case where the Tesla camera was recording people inside their garage and that did break privacy laws. Outside it does not.
