Irrespective of where fatchance sourced it, the summary he posted was a response to a Q&A written by, yes, the discredited celebrity alternative-remedy peddling anti-science quack Andrew Weil.
www.drweil.com/health-wellness/body-mind-spirit/heart/red-rice-yeast-instead-of-statins/You'll note that fatchance omitted the following from Weil's response:
"This is a valuable study, but I wouldn't recommend switching from a statin to red rice yeast without your physician's approval and supervision. Because supplements are unregulated and the demand for quality ingredients is growing, some products will not actually contain any red rice yeast extract and, as a result, won't be effective."
A bit like I said, in my earlier post. The same post about which fatchance accused me of continuing "to be dense"...
The trial Weil refers to,
Red Yeast Rice for Dyslipidemia in Statin-Intolerant Patients: A Randomized Trial is an early, small-scale, short duration randomised controlled trial in which a small cohort of patients were administered
carefully regulated, analysed (unlike commercially available) treatment with Red Rice Yeast against placebo.
Critically, it did not compare Red Rice Yeast against current statins. The purpose of the study was to find an alternative to statins for statin-intolerant patients.