Maybe, im curious about how you experience this. I would like to know in more detail. Is it the progression that makes you feel in a certain way? And if yes, why exactly is that it, etc.

Im trying to think of questions that would help direct your attention somewhere, but really anything towards questioning what it is that you like exactly about this, will be helpfull in answering the question of your post.

I can only provide a short example of myself. By getting fatter i also become weaker (or i at least percieve it like that) which is something exciting for me because im into dom/sub dynamics etc. Does that make sense of what im asking you?

The chat has still leak problems, although admitedly since some months now, they're not as bad.

It doesn't work on me because i havent a crazy high libido, i assume other people generally have a more relaxed libido.

It is a largely neutral aspect, but philosophy is interesting by itself which can be a nice distraction from one's libido! Maybe... 😅

*cough* certainly not for me *cough*

Get into phylosophy!

There is no point in arguing against this,really. This is an example where attacking the person (or, in this matter, the Fox channel) instead of the argument is a valid response, because they are not genuine. The key is to find the right rhetoric to make people believe you.



Thats not a really good argument though. For example, if people loved each other they would care for each other's "business" and that would be a good thing.

No, i am - unfortunately.

Its not that they are biased, its just that they are actively trying to make America a terrible place. The brainrot propaganda they do is just the logical continuation of that.

There is something else i wanted to point out, which ive learned through one of David Graeber's talks "All Economies are Human Economies". Look it up, its actually real good!

AHAHAHAHAHAA 🤣

This is so stupid, its like saying "We must do something for covid because a lot of people will die" and instead of letting it as that, we add "... and that will be very bad for the economy!"

You are touching on a lot of interesting issues, one being the "objectively helpfull (or unhelpful advice", the other is the possibility that someone who acts as giving (uncolicited) advice, in reality just self-serving himself in some way.

I think ive covered them pretty well on my last replies i wrote just now.

Im considering "(uncolicited) advice" to strictly be what you'd consider "valid". For example, is the advice given on point, relative to what the reciever is troubled with?

If you just want to vent, for example, for something that you know how to solve, but nevertheless gets you frustrated, the problem is... how the problem is articulated by someone who might attempt to give advice. That is, its not a matter of finding a solution (since you already know that), but something else. In this case, its actually something i can't quite pin down really, but its something within the domain "I need to socialize".

Another criteria is, is the reciever of the advice already conciously aware of the information given? If yes, thats of course another case the advice is not "valid" (=helpful) That case shouldn't be difficult to manage. The reciever should just state that. It removes the need for you to guess if they already know what you told them.

You are basically right when you say the vast majority this is not the category that "uncoliced advice" falls in. I think thats also a problem because it makes it harder for us to identify errors.

With the case where the reciever is already aware, for example, the error is not that the advice given was not apropriate, because thats a valid logical consequence of missjudging. So the error made is not on somebody's behavior, but on somebody's thinking process.
Also, i find it interesting to try and map out all of these situations that result in unhelpful "uncolicited advice" . Categories like, self-serving, missjudgements, all these are valid possibilities.