I loooove blueberry and body inflation - it's just about the same for both but berrying wins out a smidge more. It's the liquid, the churning, the skin color change - most other "Berrying" I like in that manner but bloobs always win. I think it's also because traditionally ifnlation and blueberry kink is almost always rapid-style in execution and provides instant gratification whereas real life feeding and gaining does not provide the same results (though we sure do try sometimes

Another thing is that a couple of years ago I realized it's basically an inverse version of bondage. I don't care for popping and I think that's why.

loradayton.com/2021/06/21/faq-why-body-inflation-basically-weird-bondage/

I'm too tired to go through the rest of the thread, but to answer the original thread question, yes. I don't have any specific diagnosis at this time, but I do generally have ongoing ED issues including body dysmorphia.

Keep the tabs but also fix the resolution of the screen. As it is right now on a desktop browser the chat window is just a smidge too tall for most modern resolutions. It's super annoying.

I did previews and yep, it definitely helped get upgrade referrals. Off-site I also provide samples and excerpts.

However if you are going to offer previews, you must definitely show some of the "good stuff" or feedist action that you're asking the reader to pay for.

Like Munchies said above, it's not just caloric load.

It's overall nutrition you should be focusing on. Just like people who lose weight will count macros, so do people who gain. So if your nutrition is imbalanced and doesn't get you your macro baseline, your body will fight it.

As your body gets used to the macro load and the nutrition it needs, you can also start increasing volume.

yuppppppp. the majority of FAs I've encountered are fatphobic because of this exact expectation and the fact that they do not know that fat arousing them is *not* the same as acceptance or liberation; and if they don't know that difference, it means they contribute to the oppression of it. I saw it stated perfectly elsewhere recently, that it's the assumption all feedees are just "SSBBWs in waiting" and that is not the case.

lol ngl I love this because you know, true. Brendan Fraser looks good all the time in any shape or form!

The film is literally called THE WHALE. A big, blubbery, mammal that must consume literally TONS of food to survive. It's a reference to Moby Dick.

Literally what. Lol. How are you even saying this on a site where fat people are often openly referred to as whales (consensually! ...most of the time)

It's also just so *very* easy to plug in "is the whale fatphobic" into youtube or google and listen to fat people explain how it is.

Sorry my post got cut off:

TL;DR: you want to be secretive, insist you are not who you say you are, have "a female friend" to carry your emotional load that you are also sexually attracted to but doesn't share pics that you do not morally approve of (yet won't answer as to why you feel any need to *look* at them if they aren't required to build this attraction that you insist is required to be "friends"...)

Those are all dogwhistles. At best you're a self-hating misogynist. At *best*

The last thing you need is a "female friend." What you need is a reality check.

Nice try, but if you're going to mansplain your own poor use of language to a woman that you are comparing to objects: you are using a metaphor. You did not say that women are *like* fine china (a simile), you asserted the we all *are* fine china. Neither of which are true.

Metaphor is the literal function of using an *object* to symbolize a subject or concept. And there is no place, ever, to insist that women *are* an object. Especially when you cannot experience what it is like to be the subject that you are, literally, by definition, objectifying (women). That is to say: if women want to use metaphor to describe themselves, they get to. You do not. Period.

Additionally, you are not treating the women here that you claim to care so much about with anything remotely close to respect, consideration, or care at all. You are telling us to cover up because YOU don't like it. No consideration what so ever for our choices, desires, reasons, or autonomy—none of which we owe to you. You are literally treating us as the paper plates you describe: all the same, and disposable. The fact that you keep dismissing my statements because they aren't "classy" enough for you means that I'm right. If you TRULY believed that all women deserved the care you claim they do, you would not speak to me , or any of us, in the way that you have. Your OP would not even exist. This is a fact, none of your purple-faced mansplaining backpedaling cowpie will change it.



Sure. Of course. You don't owe anyone photos of yourself. And you are not required to enjoy the ones that exist here. But you certainly have no moral standing to then come to this place and complain about the pictures that exist and shame the people who created them—which as been pointed out, you single out women, not the men or non-binary folks here who also choose to celebrate their bodies as *they* choose.

It's called autonomy. Clearly something you are well aware applies to you, but you consciously choose to conditionally revoke from others as if you have any place to. You do not. Especially in a community you have chosen to wag your finger at.



And yet! See above. You do not see us of worth. At all. And you felt you had the place to *complain* about the content here? If people "shouldn't" be posting pictures... again, why are you looking at them?



You assert that you are "a gentleman" and that you are seeking "a female friend." Your profile, language, and predictable doubling-down of everything indicate you are in fact, male. Other non-male folk don't say we want "a male friend" because we all know what that means. You want "one" friend... to confide in. And yet you don't want to be honest about who you are? That's not friendship.



Yet here you are, being harmful. And insisting you're not when the people you're harming say that you are. So yes, it's on purpose. That's a you problem.



You cannot both say that you require "sexual attraction" to create a friendship (another sign you're male: women know we don't need sexual attraction to be friends with anyone) then say you don't need photos to establish that. If anyone does feel pressured to share pics, that's not your problem or place to correct it.

TL;DR: you want to be secretive, insist you are not who you say you are, have "a female friend" to carry your emotional load that you are also sexually attract